TY - JOUR
T1 - An examination of phrase-frames in L2 english academic writing
T2 - Exploring relationships with writing quality
AU - Appel, Randy
AU - Geluso, Joe
AU - Feng, Hui Hsien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Corpus research has increasingly highlighted the importance of formulaic language (e.g., lexical bundles, n-grams) in various genres and registers. However, less attention has been paid to the value of discontinuous formulaic sequences. The present study extends research of this kind by targeting the use of phrase-frames (multi-word sequences with an internal variable slot [e.g., the * of the]) in relation to proficiency differences in L2 English academic essays produced by L1 Japanese university students. All texts were written in response to a common prompt, composed under similar conditions, and graded by trained raters. These essays were then assigned to high or low proficiency groupings based on the rating they received. Phrase frames of 4- and 5-words were extracted and analyzed for type count, token count, variability, and predictability differences. Major findings included higher proficiency writers making more frequent use of 4- and 5-word phrase frames (types and tokens), as well as using less variable, more predictable frames. Methodological and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
AB - Corpus research has increasingly highlighted the importance of formulaic language (e.g., lexical bundles, n-grams) in various genres and registers. However, less attention has been paid to the value of discontinuous formulaic sequences. The present study extends research of this kind by targeting the use of phrase-frames (multi-word sequences with an internal variable slot [e.g., the * of the]) in relation to proficiency differences in L2 English academic essays produced by L1 Japanese university students. All texts were written in response to a common prompt, composed under similar conditions, and graded by trained raters. These essays were then assigned to high or low proficiency groupings based on the rating they received. Phrase frames of 4- and 5-words were extracted and analyzed for type count, token count, variability, and predictability differences. Major findings included higher proficiency writers making more frequent use of 4- and 5-word phrase frames (types and tokens), as well as using less variable, more predictable frames. Methodological and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
KW - Corpus
KW - L2 English academic writing
KW - Phrase-frames
KW - Proficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193922652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193922652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.system.2024.103349
DO - 10.1016/j.system.2024.103349
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193922652
SN - 0346-251X
VL - 123
JO - System
JF - System
M1 - 103349
ER -