Abstract
The subject of urban quality of life and the promotion of its concept in particular, has always been the central focus of urban designers. This term is a multi-conceptual and dimensions. However most of the scholars have agreed that the concept consisted from two main dimensions; objective and subjective which these two approaches are used for its measuring. One of the important goals of urban designers is to create urban environment that all citizens have easy access to urban services, as accessibility reflects the quality of an urban environment. The present research intends to measure the public space accessibility by using objective approach in first and then by using the subjective approach for measuring in the study area to compare the results. The results revealed that there are considerable differences between objective and subjective measuring of urban quality of life in a urban space, therefore urban designers can not rely only on the results of objective measuring to understand such spaces for planning, if so, their attitudes towards urban spaces could not be an appropriate guide for explaining the quality of life for urban residents.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 417-435 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Social Indicators Research |
Volume | 94 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 Jan 1 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Accessibility
- Objective
- Public place
- Quality of life
- Subjective
- Urban
- Urban designers
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences(all)