TY - JOUR
T1 - Anti–interleukin‐6 autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases
AU - Takemura, Hiroyuki
AU - Suzuki, Hiroshi
AU - Yoshizaki, Kazuyuki
AU - Ogata, Atsushi
AU - Yuhara, Takamichi
AU - Akama, Takao
AU - Yamane, Kazuhide
AU - Kashiwagi, Heihachiro
PY - 1992/8
Y1 - 1992/8
N2 - Objective. To investigate the presence and the roles of anti–interleukin‐6 (anti–IL‐6) autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases, and to further elucidate clinical and pathophysiologic significance of anticytokine autoantibodies. Methods. Anti–IL‐6 IgG autoantibodies were measured by the 125I–IL‐6 binding activity of IgG, which was isolated from serum by protein A–Sepharose. Results. Nine of 52 sera (17.3%) from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) contained anti–IL‐6 antibodies, whereas only 1.9% of sera from normal subjects and 0–5% of sera from patients with other rheumatic diseases were positive for the antibodies. Moreover, anti–IL‐6 autoantibodies were found predominantly among patients with the limited form of SSc (42.9%), compared with those with the diffuse form (7.9%). Conclusion. Anti–IL‐6 IgG autoantibodies were detected in patients with SSc, particularly those with the limited form of the disease, at a significantly increased frequency compared with normal subjects and patients with other rheumatic diseases. These results suggest that the development of anti–IL‐6 autoantibodies and IL‐6 may have a role in the pathophysiology of SSc.
AB - Objective. To investigate the presence and the roles of anti–interleukin‐6 (anti–IL‐6) autoantibodies in rheumatic diseases, and to further elucidate clinical and pathophysiologic significance of anticytokine autoantibodies. Methods. Anti–IL‐6 IgG autoantibodies were measured by the 125I–IL‐6 binding activity of IgG, which was isolated from serum by protein A–Sepharose. Results. Nine of 52 sera (17.3%) from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) contained anti–IL‐6 antibodies, whereas only 1.9% of sera from normal subjects and 0–5% of sera from patients with other rheumatic diseases were positive for the antibodies. Moreover, anti–IL‐6 autoantibodies were found predominantly among patients with the limited form of SSc (42.9%), compared with those with the diffuse form (7.9%). Conclusion. Anti–IL‐6 IgG autoantibodies were detected in patients with SSc, particularly those with the limited form of the disease, at a significantly increased frequency compared with normal subjects and patients with other rheumatic diseases. These results suggest that the development of anti–IL‐6 autoantibodies and IL‐6 may have a role in the pathophysiology of SSc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026690770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026690770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/art.1780350814
DO - 10.1002/art.1780350814
M3 - Article
C2 - 1642659
AN - SCOPUS:0026690770
SN - 0004-3591
VL - 35
SP - 940
EP - 943
JO - Arthritis & Rheumatism
JF - Arthritis & Rheumatism
IS - 8
ER -