TY - JOUR
T1 - Area-Level Disparities of Public Open Space
T2 - A Geographic Information Systems Analysis in Metropolitan Melbourne
AU - Mavoa, Suzanne
AU - Koohsari, Mohammad Javad
AU - Badland, Hannah M.
AU - Davern, Melanie
AU - Feng, Xiaoqi
AU - Astell-Burt, Thomas
AU - Giles-Corti, Billie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research.
PY - 2015/7/3
Y1 - 2015/7/3
N2 - This article examines differences in proximity to, and size of, four types of public open space for different levels of socio-economic disadvantage in metropolitan Melbourne. Since the provision of public open space in Melbourne is guided by the Victoria Planning Provisions (VPP), this article also demonstrates the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as a tool to compare the current distribution of public open space with policy. Measures of distance to, and size of, the closest public open space were derived using GIS and analysed according to area-level socio-economic disadvantage. A novel method of estimating public open space access points is introduced. Over one-third of dwellings in metropolitan Melbourne were located in areas that did not align with the VPP public open space proximity standard; however, we found no evidence of a socio-economic gradient in terms of compliance. There were statistically significant differences between disadvantaged and advantaged areas with respect to proximity to, and size of, public open space. However, while the differences were statistically significant the magnitudes of the differences were small. Future research needs to investigate how different measures (e.g. quality, size) can be included in planning regulations to support equitable provision of public open space.
AB - This article examines differences in proximity to, and size of, four types of public open space for different levels of socio-economic disadvantage in metropolitan Melbourne. Since the provision of public open space in Melbourne is guided by the Victoria Planning Provisions (VPP), this article also demonstrates the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as a tool to compare the current distribution of public open space with policy. Measures of distance to, and size of, the closest public open space were derived using GIS and analysed according to area-level socio-economic disadvantage. A novel method of estimating public open space access points is introduced. Over one-third of dwellings in metropolitan Melbourne were located in areas that did not align with the VPP public open space proximity standard; however, we found no evidence of a socio-economic gradient in terms of compliance. There were statistically significant differences between disadvantaged and advantaged areas with respect to proximity to, and size of, public open space. However, while the differences were statistically significant the magnitudes of the differences were small. Future research needs to investigate how different measures (e.g. quality, size) can be included in planning regulations to support equitable provision of public open space.
KW - Melbourne
KW - Public open space
KW - accessibility
KW - equity
KW - geographic information systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947496070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947496070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08111146.2014.974747
DO - 10.1080/08111146.2014.974747
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84947496070
SN - 0811-1146
VL - 33
SP - 306
EP - 323
JO - Urban Policy and Research
JF - Urban Policy and Research
IS - 3
ER -