Bridging the gap between semantic web service composition and common implementation architectures

Fuyuki Ishikawa*, Satoshi Katafuchi, Florian Wagner, Yoshiaki Fukazawa, Shinichi Honiden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Semantic web techniques have been leveraged in planning methods for automated service composition. Typically, inputs and outputs of services are described in abstract concepts for efficient and meaningful matching between output of one service and input of another. However, existing methods have not examined concrete data structures, which are essential for successful service interaction in common implementation architectures. To address the problem, this paper proposes a matching method that can be incorporated into existing planning methods to ensure consistency in concrete data structures. The proposed method applies a two-phase matching process to efficiently filter out services that do not match at the abstract level. It also applies a data structure to organize similar services according to their relationships for efficient matching during the planning process.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2011
Pages152-159
Number of pages8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event2011 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2011 - Washington, DC, United States
Duration: 2011 Jul 42011 Jul 9

Publication series

NameProceedings - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2011

Conference

Conference2011 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, SCC 2011
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityWashington, DC
Period11/7/411/7/9

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the gap between semantic web service composition and common implementation architectures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this