TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of gait event detection from shanks and feet in single-task and multi-task walking of healthy older adults
AU - Kong, W.
AU - Lin, J.
AU - Waaning, L.
AU - Sessa, S.
AU - Cosentino, S.
AU - Magistro, D.
AU - Zecca, M.
AU - Kawashima, R.
AU - Takanishi, A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Automatic and objective detection algorithms for gait events from MEMS Inertial Measurement Units data have been developed to overcome subjective inaccuracy in traditional visual observation. Their accuracy and sensitivity have been verified with healthy older adults, Parkinson's disease and spinal injured patients, using single-task gait exercises, where events are precise as the subject is focusing only on walking. Multi-task walking instead simulates a more realistic and challenging scenario where subjects perform secondary cognitive task while walking, so it is a better benchmark. In this paper, we test two algorithms based on shank and foot angular velocity data in single-task, dual-task and multi-task walking. Results show that both algorithms fail when the subject slows extremely down or pauses due to high cognitive and attentional load, and, in particular, the first stride detection error rate of the foot-based algorithm increases. Stride time is accurate with both algorithms regardless of walking types, but the shank-based algorithm leads to an overestimation on the proportion of swing phase in one gait cycle. Increasing the number of cognitive tasks also causes this error with both algorithms.
AB - Automatic and objective detection algorithms for gait events from MEMS Inertial Measurement Units data have been developed to overcome subjective inaccuracy in traditional visual observation. Their accuracy and sensitivity have been verified with healthy older adults, Parkinson's disease and spinal injured patients, using single-task gait exercises, where events are precise as the subject is focusing only on walking. Multi-task walking instead simulates a more realistic and challenging scenario where subjects perform secondary cognitive task while walking, so it is a better benchmark. In this paper, we test two algorithms based on shank and foot angular velocity data in single-task, dual-task and multi-task walking. Results show that both algorithms fail when the subject slows extremely down or pauses due to high cognitive and attentional load, and, in particular, the first stride detection error rate of the foot-based algorithm increases. Stride time is accurate with both algorithms regardless of walking types, but the shank-based algorithm leads to an overestimation on the proportion of swing phase in one gait cycle. Increasing the number of cognitive tasks also causes this error with both algorithms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016781343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016781343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ROBIO.2016.7866633
DO - 10.1109/ROBIO.2016.7866633
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85016781343
T3 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2016
SP - 2063
EP - 2068
BT - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2016
Y2 - 3 December 2016 through 7 December 2016
ER -