TY - JOUR
T1 - Context Impacts on Confirmation Bias
T2 - Evidence from the 2017 Japanese Snap Election Compared with American and German Findings
AU - Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia
AU - Liu, Ling
AU - Hino, Airo
AU - Westerwick, Axel
AU - Johnson, Benjamin K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15KK0136 and 2017 Suntory Fellowship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Much concern exists about individuals' tendency to favor attitude-consistent messages (confirmation bias) and the consequences for democracy; yet, empirical evidence is predominantly based on U.S. data and may not apply to other cultural contexts. The current three-session online experimental study unobtrusively observed Japanese participants' (N = 200) selective exposure to political news articles right before the 2017 Japanese snap general election. The research design paralleled an earlier U.S. study and a German study, which allowed direct comparisons of confirmation biases among the three countries. Japanese exhibited a confirmation bias, but it was smaller than the confirmation bias among Americans, though comparable to that of Germans. The extent of the confirmation bias among Japanese participants was influenced by individual media trust, which provides new insight into causes of these cross-country differences. Attitudinal impacts resulted from selective exposure, in line with message stance, and persisted for two days.
AB - Much concern exists about individuals' tendency to favor attitude-consistent messages (confirmation bias) and the consequences for democracy; yet, empirical evidence is predominantly based on U.S. data and may not apply to other cultural contexts. The current three-session online experimental study unobtrusively observed Japanese participants' (N = 200) selective exposure to political news articles right before the 2017 Japanese snap general election. The research design paralleled an earlier U.S. study and a German study, which allowed direct comparisons of confirmation biases among the three countries. Japanese exhibited a confirmation bias, but it was smaller than the confirmation bias among Americans, though comparable to that of Germans. The extent of the confirmation bias among Japanese participants was influenced by individual media trust, which provides new insight into causes of these cross-country differences. Attitudinal impacts resulted from selective exposure, in line with message stance, and persisted for two days.
KW - Confirmation Bias
KW - Cross-Cultural
KW - Election
KW - Media Trust
KW - Media-Party Parallelism
KW - Public Broadcasting Services
KW - Selective Exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074605094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074605094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/hcr/hqz005
DO - 10.1093/hcr/hqz005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074605094
SN - 0360-3989
VL - 45
SP - 427
EP - 449
JO - Human Communication Research
JF - Human Communication Research
IS - 4
ER -