Abstract
Public reason liberalism takes as its starting point the deep and irreconcilable diversity we find characterizing liberal societies. This deep and irreconcilable diversity creates problems for social order. One method for adjudicating these conflicts is through the use of rights. This paper is about the ability of such rights to adjudicate disputes when perspectival disagreements—or disagreements over how to categorize objects in the world—obtain. We present both formal possibility and impossibility results for rights structures under varying degrees of perspectival diversity. We show that though perspectival diversity appears to be a troubling problem for the prospect of stable social order, if rights are defined properly then disagreements can likely be resolved in a consistent manner, achieving social cooperation rather than conflict.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 839-865 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Synthese |
Volume | 197 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 Feb 1 |
Keywords
- Diversity
- Liberalism
- Public reason
- Rights
- Social choice theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Social Sciences(all)