TY - GEN
T1 - Do words reveal concepts?
AU - Malt, Barbara C.
AU - Ameel, Eef
AU - Gennari, Silvia
AU - Imai, Mutsumi
AU - Saji, Noburo
AU - Majid, Asifa
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Max Planck Gesellschaft, the Japanese Ministry of Education grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (#15300088), and research grants from Keio University. Eef Ameel is supported on a postdoctoral fellowship by the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders. We thank Adam Darlow, Kiri Lee, Yo Matsumoto, Kyoko Ohara, Dan Slobin, Steven Sloman, and Phillip Wolff for useful discussion. Kristine Schuster and Hiroyuki Okada developed the web experiment for Study 1, Naoaki Tsuda created the sorting program for Study 2, and Stephanie Sterrett served as walkway actor. Ludy Cilissen, Lisa Guest, Celina Hayes, and Erin Howard assisted with data collection and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© CogSci 2011.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - To study concepts, cognitive scientists must first identify some. The prevailing assumption is that they are revealed by words such as triangle, table, and robin. But languages vary dramatically in how they carve up the world by name. Either ordinary concepts must be heavily language-dependent or names cannot be a direct route to concepts. We asked English, Dutch, Spanish, and Japanese speakers to name videos of human locomotion and judge their similarities. We investigated what name inventories and scaling solutions on name similarity and on physical similarity for the groups individually and together suggest about the underlying concepts. Aggregated naming and similarity solutions converged on results distinct from the answers suggested by any single language. Words such as triangle, table, and robin help identify the conceptual space of a domain, but they do not directly reveal units of knowledge usefully considered “concepts.”
AB - To study concepts, cognitive scientists must first identify some. The prevailing assumption is that they are revealed by words such as triangle, table, and robin. But languages vary dramatically in how they carve up the world by name. Either ordinary concepts must be heavily language-dependent or names cannot be a direct route to concepts. We asked English, Dutch, Spanish, and Japanese speakers to name videos of human locomotion and judge their similarities. We investigated what name inventories and scaling solutions on name similarity and on physical similarity for the groups individually and together suggest about the underlying concepts. Aggregated naming and similarity solutions converged on results distinct from the answers suggested by any single language. Words such as triangle, table, and robin help identify the conceptual space of a domain, but they do not directly reveal units of knowledge usefully considered “concepts.”
KW - concepts
KW - cross-linguistic diversity
KW - locomotion
KW - naming
KW - universality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139050435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139050435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85139050435
T3 - Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011
SP - 519
EP - 524
BT - Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011
A2 - Carlson, Laura
A2 - Hoelscher, Christoph
A2 - Shipley, Thomas F.
PB - The Cognitive Science Society
T2 - 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science, CogSci 2011
Y2 - 20 July 2011 through 23 July 2011
ER -