Educational needs of Japan’s dementia care workforce: Results of a national online survey

Michael J. Annear*, Fumi Nagasawa, Kano Terawaki, Fuyuko Nagarekawa, Xin Gao, Junko Otani

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Dementia prevalence is increasing in Japan commensurate with population ageing. This study addresses the paucity of research concerning the dementia education needs of Japanese health workers who care for older adults. A random sample of 117 aged care workers was generated from government lists of institutions and services across eight regions of Japan. Volunteer respondents completed an online survey concerning perceptions of dementia, professional educational needs and demographic information. Japanese aged care workers identified a high prevalence of dementia among their clients and acknowledged the value of professional education; however, they only reported moderate levels of dementia knowledge and confidence with care provision. Educational preferences included learning about non-pharmacological treatments for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, workshop and mentor-based programmes, and incentivising education through formal certification and targeting content to professions. This research may inform the development of educational interventions for aged care workers, which may ultimately affect care for people with dementia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-60
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Ageing and Later Life
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aged care
  • Dementia
  • Japan
  • National survey
  • Professional education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Health(social science)
  • Cultural Studies
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educational needs of Japan’s dementia care workforce: Results of a national online survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this