TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Menstrual Phase-Dependent Resistance Training Frequency on Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength
AU - Sakamaki-Sunaga, Mikako
AU - Min, Seokki
AU - Kamemoto, Kayoko
AU - Okamoto, Takanobu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Sakamaki-Sunaga, M, Min, S, Kamemoto, K, and Okamoto, T. Effects of menstrual phase-dependent resistance training frequency on muscular hypertrophy and strength. J Strength Cond Res 30(6): 1727-1734, 2016 - The present study investigated how different training frequencies during menstrual phases affect muscle hypertrophy and strength. Fourteen eumenorrheic women performed 3 sets of arm curls (8-15 repetitions) until failure for 12 weeks. Depending on the menstrual cycle phase, each subject trained each arm separately after either a 3- or a 1-d·wk -1 training protocol during the follicular phase (FP-T) and a 3- or 1-d·wk -1 training protocol during the luteal phase (LP-T). Cross-sectional area (CSA), 1 repetition maximum, and maximum voluntary contraction significantly increased 6.2 ± 4.4, 36.4 ± 11.9, and 16.7 ± 5.6%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 vs. before training), in the FP-T group and 7.8 ± 4.2, 31.8 ± 14.1, and 14.9 ± 12.7%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 vs. before training), in the LP-T group. Changes in CSA between the FP-T and the LP-T groups significantly and positively correlated (r 0.54, p ≤ 0.05). There were no major differences among the different training protocols with regard to muscle hypertrophy and strength. Therefore, we suggest that variations in female hormones induced by the menstrual cycle phases do not significantly contribute to muscle hypertrophy and strength gains during 12 weeks of resistance training.
AB - Sakamaki-Sunaga, M, Min, S, Kamemoto, K, and Okamoto, T. Effects of menstrual phase-dependent resistance training frequency on muscular hypertrophy and strength. J Strength Cond Res 30(6): 1727-1734, 2016 - The present study investigated how different training frequencies during menstrual phases affect muscle hypertrophy and strength. Fourteen eumenorrheic women performed 3 sets of arm curls (8-15 repetitions) until failure for 12 weeks. Depending on the menstrual cycle phase, each subject trained each arm separately after either a 3- or a 1-d·wk -1 training protocol during the follicular phase (FP-T) and a 3- or 1-d·wk -1 training protocol during the luteal phase (LP-T). Cross-sectional area (CSA), 1 repetition maximum, and maximum voluntary contraction significantly increased 6.2 ± 4.4, 36.4 ± 11.9, and 16.7 ± 5.6%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 vs. before training), in the FP-T group and 7.8 ± 4.2, 31.8 ± 14.1, and 14.9 ± 12.7%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05 vs. before training), in the LP-T group. Changes in CSA between the FP-T and the LP-T groups significantly and positively correlated (r 0.54, p ≤ 0.05). There were no major differences among the different training protocols with regard to muscle hypertrophy and strength. Therefore, we suggest that variations in female hormones induced by the menstrual cycle phases do not significantly contribute to muscle hypertrophy and strength gains during 12 weeks of resistance training.
KW - estrogen
KW - menstrual cycle
KW - progesterone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973299453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973299453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001250
DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001250
M3 - Article
C2 - 26554551
AN - SCOPUS:84973299453
SN - 1064-8011
VL - 30
SP - 1727
EP - 1734
JO - Journal of strength and conditioning research
JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research
IS - 6
ER -