TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of model types in observational learning on implicit sequential learning
AU - Tanaka, Kanji
AU - Watanabe, Katsumi
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (20727086) and JSPS Fellows to K.T. and CREST (JPMJCR14E4) to K.W.
Publisher Copyright:
© Experimental Psychology Society 2017.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This study investigated whether implicit learning of sequence by observation occurred in a serial reaction time task and whether the learning effects were modulated by model behavioral type. In Experiment 1, we let 20 participants perform a sequence for 12 blocks and chose the best and worst performance models based on reaction time and errors. In Experiment 2, new observers viewed a movie clip chosen from the following three: the best model performing the sequential task in the first (the first six blocks) or second session (the last six blocks), or the worst model performing the task in the first session. Then, the observers performed the observed sequence, a test sequence and awareness test. We found that (1) implicit sequential learning occurred by observation regardless of model behavior type, (2) the learning effects were not susceptible to model behavior type and (3) speed index reflecting reaction time became larger even in the test session when the observers viewed the best model performing the second session. Overall, observers developed general motor representations through action–observation. In addition, their responses were also contagious; if the model performed the sequence faster, the observer might be able to perform the sequence faster.
AB - This study investigated whether implicit learning of sequence by observation occurred in a serial reaction time task and whether the learning effects were modulated by model behavioral type. In Experiment 1, we let 20 participants perform a sequence for 12 blocks and chose the best and worst performance models based on reaction time and errors. In Experiment 2, new observers viewed a movie clip chosen from the following three: the best model performing the sequential task in the first (the first six blocks) or second session (the last six blocks), or the worst model performing the task in the first session. Then, the observers performed the observed sequence, a test sequence and awareness test. We found that (1) implicit sequential learning occurred by observation regardless of model behavior type, (2) the learning effects were not susceptible to model behavior type and (3) speed index reflecting reaction time became larger even in the test session when the observers viewed the best model performing the second session. Overall, observers developed general motor representations through action–observation. In addition, their responses were also contagious; if the model performed the sequence faster, the observer might be able to perform the sequence faster.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Implicit learning
KW - Observational learning
KW - Sequential learning
KW - Speed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054779804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054779804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2017.1342672
DO - 10.1080/17470218.2017.1342672
M3 - Article
C2 - 28856961
AN - SCOPUS:85054779804
SN - 1747-0218
VL - 71
SP - 1596
EP - 1606
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 7
ER -