TY - JOUR
T1 - EMF 35 JMIP study for Japan’s long-term climate and energy policy
T2 - scenario designs and key findings
AU - Sugiyama, Masahiro
AU - Fujimori, Shinichiro
AU - Wada, Kenichi
AU - Oshiro, Ken
AU - Kato, Etsushi
AU - Komiyama, Ryoichi
AU - Silva Herran, Diego
AU - Matsuo, Yuhji
AU - Shiraki, Hiroto
AU - Ju, Yiyi
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF20172004) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan. MS was also supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP20H04395. KO was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP20K14860 and the Environmental Research and Technology Development Fund JPMEERF20201002 of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan. SF and KO were supported by the Sumitomo Foundation. RK was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP20H02679 and JP17H03531. DSH was supported by the Environmental Research and Technology Development Fund (1-2002) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan, and by the Strategic Operation Fund and the Strategic Research Fund of IGES.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - In June, 2019, Japan submitted its mid-century strategy to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and pledged 80% emissions cuts by 2050. The strategy has not gone through a systematic analysis, however. The present study, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 35 Japan Model Intercomparison project (JMIP), employs five energy-economic and integrated assessment models to evaluate the nationally determined contribution and mid-century strategy of Japan. EMF 35 JMIP conducts a suite of sensitivity analyses on dimensions including emissions constraints, technology availability, and demand projections. The results confirm that Japan needs to deploy all of its mitigation strategies at a substantial scale, including energy efficiency, electricity decarbonization, and end-use electrification. Moreover, they suggest that with the absence of structural changes in the economy, heavy industries will be one of the hardest to decarbonize. Partitioning of the sum of squares based on a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reconfirms that mitigation strategies, such as energy efficiency and electrification, are fairly robust across models and scenarios, but that the cost metrics are uncertain. There is a wide gap of policy strength and breadth between the current policy instruments and those suggested by the models. Japan should strengthen its climate action in all aspects of society and economy to achieve its long-term target.
AB - In June, 2019, Japan submitted its mid-century strategy to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and pledged 80% emissions cuts by 2050. The strategy has not gone through a systematic analysis, however. The present study, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 35 Japan Model Intercomparison project (JMIP), employs five energy-economic and integrated assessment models to evaluate the nationally determined contribution and mid-century strategy of Japan. EMF 35 JMIP conducts a suite of sensitivity analyses on dimensions including emissions constraints, technology availability, and demand projections. The results confirm that Japan needs to deploy all of its mitigation strategies at a substantial scale, including energy efficiency, electricity decarbonization, and end-use electrification. Moreover, they suggest that with the absence of structural changes in the economy, heavy industries will be one of the hardest to decarbonize. Partitioning of the sum of squares based on a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reconfirms that mitigation strategies, such as energy efficiency and electrification, are fairly robust across models and scenarios, but that the cost metrics are uncertain. There is a wide gap of policy strength and breadth between the current policy instruments and those suggested by the models. Japan should strengthen its climate action in all aspects of society and economy to achieve its long-term target.
KW - Carbon neutrality
KW - Climate change mitigation
KW - Integrated assessment
KW - Long-term strategy
KW - National climate policy
KW - Net-zero emissions
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101121423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101121423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11625-021-00913-2
DO - 10.1007/s11625-021-00913-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101121423
SN - 1862-4065
VL - 16
SP - 355
EP - 374
JO - Sustainability Science
JF - Sustainability Science
IS - 2
ER -