TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - The spectral evolution of the first galaxies. III. Simulated james webb space telescope spectra of reionization-epoch galaxies with lyman-continuum leakage (Astrophysical Journal (2017) 836 (78) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/78)
AU - Zackrisson, Erik
AU - Binggeli, Christian
AU - Finlator, Kristian
AU - Gnedin, Nickolay Y.
AU - Paardekooper, Jan Pieter
AU - Shimizu, Ikkoh
AU - Inoue, Akio K.
AU - Jensen, Hannes
AU - Micheva, Genoveva
AU - Khochfar, Sadegh
AU - Vecchia, Claudio Dalla
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/10
Y1 - 2021/2/10
N2 - Due to a mistake, the BPASS v2.0 binary-star model (Stanway et al. 2016) used in Figure 6(b) of the published article featured a different initial mass function (IMF) than the Geneva single-star model used for comparison. While the Geneva model used the Kroupa universal IMF (Kroupa 2001) with upper slope α = 2.3 (dN dM ∝ M-α) at 0.5 ≤ M(M⊙) ≤ 100, the BPASS model used a slope of α = 2.0 throughout the same mass interval. Hence, in its original form, that figure actually illustrated the combined effect of assuming binary stars and adopting a more extreme IMF. This resulted in a greater number of massive stars and a boosted ionizing flux for the BPASS model. In the revised Figure 6(b), we show the corrected comparison with identical IMF slopes (α = 2.3). In this case, the shift between the two sets of simulated galaxies in the EW(Hβ)-β diagram is more modest than in the published article. The galaxies simulated using the BPASS binary-star model are shifted by an average Δ(EW(Hβ)) ≈ 0.2 compared to galaxies simulated using the Geneva single-star model. The difference in UV slope β between the two sets of simulated galaxies is also smaller in the corrected version (Δ(β) < 0.1 on average). The risk of misclassifying high-fesc objects due using a stellar evolutionary model not representative of z > 7 galaxies is therefore somewhat smaller than indicated in the published article. (Figure Presented).
AB - Due to a mistake, the BPASS v2.0 binary-star model (Stanway et al. 2016) used in Figure 6(b) of the published article featured a different initial mass function (IMF) than the Geneva single-star model used for comparison. While the Geneva model used the Kroupa universal IMF (Kroupa 2001) with upper slope α = 2.3 (dN dM ∝ M-α) at 0.5 ≤ M(M⊙) ≤ 100, the BPASS model used a slope of α = 2.0 throughout the same mass interval. Hence, in its original form, that figure actually illustrated the combined effect of assuming binary stars and adopting a more extreme IMF. This resulted in a greater number of massive stars and a boosted ionizing flux for the BPASS model. In the revised Figure 6(b), we show the corrected comparison with identical IMF slopes (α = 2.3). In this case, the shift between the two sets of simulated galaxies in the EW(Hβ)-β diagram is more modest than in the published article. The galaxies simulated using the BPASS binary-star model are shifted by an average Δ(EW(Hβ)) ≈ 0.2 compared to galaxies simulated using the Geneva single-star model. The difference in UV slope β between the two sets of simulated galaxies is also smaller in the corrected version (Δ(β) < 0.1 on average). The risk of misclassifying high-fesc objects due using a stellar evolutionary model not representative of z > 7 galaxies is therefore somewhat smaller than indicated in the published article. (Figure Presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101580854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101580854&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1b2
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1b2
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85101580854
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 908
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - abe1b2
ER -