TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Fairness and Justice of External English Language Test Score Interpretation and Use for Japanese University Admission
AU - Saito, Hidetoshi
AU - Sawaki, Yasuyo
AU - Kasahara, Kiwamu
N1 - Funding Information:
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the symposium in the 22nd Conference of Japan Language Testing Association held in Niigata. Sincere appreciation goes to our discussant, Dr. Antony Kunnan, for his insightful comments and answering many questions of ours and to Yo In’nami for his contribution in the early stages of this study. We also thank Tatsuro Tahara, Hiroya Tanaka, and LAQ reviewers for their insightful comments. However, the authors are solely responsible for any errors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The study evaluated a recently postponed national test policy on the use of external agencies’ English tests measuring four skills for Japanese university admission purposes. Using Kunnan’s principles of fairness and justice, we generated and evaluated three claims regarding the test policy: vocabulary coverage of the tests, the justifiability of the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR)-based concordance table, and tests’ impact on teaching and learning productive skills. Scrutinizing the backing and rebuttal evidence from the test agencies’ voices to the key literature, we arrived at a partial acceptance of all three claims with the need for further research, calling into question a optimistic outlook underlying the test policy.
AB - The study evaluated a recently postponed national test policy on the use of external agencies’ English tests measuring four skills for Japanese university admission purposes. Using Kunnan’s principles of fairness and justice, we generated and evaluated three claims regarding the test policy: vocabulary coverage of the tests, the justifiability of the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR)-based concordance table, and tests’ impact on teaching and learning productive skills. Scrutinizing the backing and rebuttal evidence from the test agencies’ voices to the key literature, we arrived at a partial acceptance of all three claims with the need for further research, calling into question a optimistic outlook underlying the test policy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135093971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135093971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15434303.2022.2083965
DO - 10.1080/15434303.2022.2083965
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135093971
SN - 1543-4303
VL - 19
SP - 422
EP - 448
JO - Language Assessment Quarterly
JF - Language Assessment Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -