TY - JOUR
T1 - Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks
AU - Caithness, Graham
AU - Osu, Rieko
AU - Bays, Paul
AU - Chase, Henry
AU - Klassen, Jessica
AU - Kawato, Mitsuo
AU - Wolpert, Daniel M.
AU - Flanagan, J. Randall
PY - 2004/10/6
Y1 - 2004/10/6
N2 - An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.
AB - An influential idea in human motor learning is that there is a consolidation period during which motor memories are transformed from a fragile to a permanent state, no longer susceptible to interference from new learning. The evidence supporting this idea comes from studies showing that the motor memory of a task (A) is lost when an opposing task (B) is experienced soon after, but not if sufficient time is allowed to pass (∼6 hr). We report results from three laboratories challenging this consolidation idea. We used an ABA paradigm in the context of a reaching task to assess the influence of experiencing B after A on the retention of A. In two experiments using visuomotor rotations, we found that B fully interferes with the retention of A even when B is experienced 24 hr after A. Contrary to previous reports, in four experiments on learning force fields, we also observed full interference between A and B when they are separated by 24 hr or even 1 week. This latter result holds for both position-dependent and velocity-dependent force fields. For both the visuomotor and force-field tasks, complete interference is still observed when the possible affects of anterograde interference are controlled through the use of washout trials. Our results fail to support the idea that motor memories become consolidated into a protected state. Rather, they are consistent with recent ideas of memory formation, which propose that memories can shift between active and inactive states.
KW - Arm movement
KW - Force field
KW - Internal models
KW - Motor learning
KW - Retrograde interference
KW - Visuomotor rotation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5444270048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5444270048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004
M3 - Article
C2 - 15470131
AN - SCOPUS:5444270048
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 24
SP - 8662
EP - 8671
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 40
ER -