TY - GEN
T1 - FG2015 age progression evaluation
AU - Lanitis, Andreas
AU - Tsapatsoulis, Nicolas
AU - Soteriou, Kleanthis
AU - Kuwahara, Daiki
AU - Morishima, Shigeo
PY - 2015/7/17
Y1 - 2015/7/17
N2 - The topic of face-aging received increased attention by the computer vision community during the recent years. This interest is motivated by important real life applications where accurate age progression algorithms can be used. However, age progression methodologies may only be used in real applications provided that they have the ability to produce accurate age progressed images. Therefore it is of utmost importance to encourage the development of accurate age progression algorithms through the formulation of performance evaluation protocols that can be used for obtaining accurate performance evaluation results for different algorithms reported in the literature. In this paper we describe the organization of the, first ever, pilot independent age progression competition that aims to provide the basis of a robust framework for assessing age progression methodologies. The evaluation carried out involves the use of several machine-based and human-based indicators that were used for assessing eight age progression methods.
AB - The topic of face-aging received increased attention by the computer vision community during the recent years. This interest is motivated by important real life applications where accurate age progression algorithms can be used. However, age progression methodologies may only be used in real applications provided that they have the ability to produce accurate age progressed images. Therefore it is of utmost importance to encourage the development of accurate age progression algorithms through the formulation of performance evaluation protocols that can be used for obtaining accurate performance evaluation results for different algorithms reported in the literature. In this paper we describe the organization of the, first ever, pilot independent age progression competition that aims to provide the basis of a robust framework for assessing age progression methodologies. The evaluation carried out involves the use of several machine-based and human-based indicators that were used for assessing eight age progression methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944916552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944916552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FG.2015.7163157
DO - 10.1109/FG.2015.7163157
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84944916552
T3 - 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG 2015
BT - 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG 2015
Y2 - 4 May 2015 through 8 May 2015
ER -