TY - JOUR
T1 - Group resilience in incidents of varying degrees of danger and frequency
AU - Ozeki, Miki
AU - Yonezawa, Kanako
AU - Negayama, Koichi
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Group resilience is the competency of a group to recover from an accident and maintain its activity. It is captured by the sequence of behaviors of its members. In this study, group resilience was defined in terms of four key abilities, namely the ability to prevent undesirable incidents from happening, to keep undesirable incidents from worsening, to recover from an accident after it has already occurred, and to maintain group activity levels.The present study aimed at exploring whether these four abilities were exerted differently according to incidents of varying degrees of danger and frequency.The results of the study showed that moderately dangerous incidents occurring frequently were rarely remained unsolved. Ability to prevent undesirable incidents from happening and ability to keep undesirable incidents from worsening were also shown to be instrumental in solutions for less dangerous incidents that sometimes occurred, though such incidents were hardly ever settled by the group's ability to maintain its levels of activity. Frequent incidents that were a little dangerous were not settled by ability to prevent undesirable incidents.The ability to prevent undesirable incidents from occurring was not effective in such incidents. Furthermore, the study found that if group members did not have prior experience handling rare incidents that were dangerous, group resilience might not be exerted on such circumstances.
AB - Group resilience is the competency of a group to recover from an accident and maintain its activity. It is captured by the sequence of behaviors of its members. In this study, group resilience was defined in terms of four key abilities, namely the ability to prevent undesirable incidents from happening, to keep undesirable incidents from worsening, to recover from an accident after it has already occurred, and to maintain group activity levels.The present study aimed at exploring whether these four abilities were exerted differently according to incidents of varying degrees of danger and frequency.The results of the study showed that moderately dangerous incidents occurring frequently were rarely remained unsolved. Ability to prevent undesirable incidents from happening and ability to keep undesirable incidents from worsening were also shown to be instrumental in solutions for less dangerous incidents that sometimes occurred, though such incidents were hardly ever settled by the group's ability to maintain its levels of activity. Frequent incidents that were a little dangerous were not settled by ability to prevent undesirable incidents.The ability to prevent undesirable incidents from occurring was not effective in such incidents. Furthermore, the study found that if group members did not have prior experience handling rare incidents that were dangerous, group resilience might not be exerted on such circumstances.
KW - Group
KW - Group resilience
KW - Risk
KW - Safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997109069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997109069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14966/jssp.31.1_13
DO - 10.14966/jssp.31.1_13
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84997109069
SN - 0916-1503
VL - 31
SP - 13
EP - 24
JO - Research in Social Psychology
JF - Research in Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -