TY - JOUR
T1 - High-growth firms
T2 - Introduction to the special section
AU - Coad, Alex
AU - Daunfeldt, Sven Olov
AU - Hölzl, Werner
AU - Johansson, Dan
AU - Nightingale, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
This special section would not have been possible without help and support from many people. We especially want to thank Niclas Berggren, Nils Karlsson, and Camilla Sandberg at Ratio. We are indebted to Marco Vivarelli for many helpful comments and advice during the workshop and throughout the special section editorial process. Daunfeldt and Johansson gratefully acknowledge financial support from Ragnar Söderberg’s Foundation. Nightingale and Coad gratefully acknowledge support from the ESRC-TSB-NESTA-BIS IRC research grants RES-598-25-0054 and ES/J008427/1. The usual caveat applies.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - High-growth firms (HGFs) have attracted considerable attention recently, as academics and policymakers have increasingly recognized the highly skewed nature of many metrics of firm performance. A small number of HGFs drives a disproportionately large amount of job creation, while the average firm has a limited impact on the economy. This article explores the reasons for this increased interest, summarizes the existing literature, and highlights the methodological considerations that constrain and bias research. This special section draws attention to the importance of HGFs for future industrial performance, explores their unusual growth trajectories and strategies, and highlights the lack of persistence of high growth. Consequently, while HGFs are important for understanding the economy and developing public policy, they are unlikely to be useful vehicles for public policy given the difficulties involved in predicting which firms will grow, the lack of persistence in high growth levels, and the complex and often indirect relationship between firm capability, high growth, and macro-economic performance.
AB - High-growth firms (HGFs) have attracted considerable attention recently, as academics and policymakers have increasingly recognized the highly skewed nature of many metrics of firm performance. A small number of HGFs drives a disproportionately large amount of job creation, while the average firm has a limited impact on the economy. This article explores the reasons for this increased interest, summarizes the existing literature, and highlights the methodological considerations that constrain and bias research. This special section draws attention to the importance of HGFs for future industrial performance, explores their unusual growth trajectories and strategies, and highlights the lack of persistence of high growth. Consequently, while HGFs are important for understanding the economy and developing public policy, they are unlikely to be useful vehicles for public policy given the difficulties involved in predicting which firms will grow, the lack of persistence in high growth levels, and the complex and often indirect relationship between firm capability, high growth, and macro-economic performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892494023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892494023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/icc/dtt052
DO - 10.1093/icc/dtt052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84892494023
SN - 0960-6491
VL - 23
SP - 91
EP - 112
JO - Industrial and Corporate Change
JF - Industrial and Corporate Change
IS - 1
ER -