TY - GEN
T1 - Improvement in drop shock reliability of Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu BGA interconnects by Ni addition
AU - Tanaka, Masamoto
AU - Sasaki, Tsutomu
AU - Kobayashi, Takayuki
AU - Tatsumi, Kohei
PY - 2006/12/22
Y1 - 2006/12/22
N2 - The drop shock reliability of an Sn-Ag-Cu solder system in ball grid array (BGA) interconnects were improved by selecting a lower Ag chemical content and the addition of a small amount of Ni. The drop shock reliability of Sn-Ag-Cu solder in BGA interconnects was enhanced by the addition of small amount of Ni, and LF35(Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni) had twice better drop shock reliability than LF45(Sn-3.0Ag0.5Cu). One of the main reasons is the solder with lower Ag contents in the Sn-Ag-Cu solder system demonstrated softer properties in terms of hardness. Different intermetallic compound (IMC) layer morphologies were found on the Cu electrodes after reflow between Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, in which the former is smooth IMC and the latter is like a peninsula IMC. Different cracks modes were also detected. Cracks in Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni were mainly inside solder and cracks in Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu were near the solder/electrode interface for all drop shocks tested. From SEM, EPMA mapping and TEM analysis, the small amount of doped Ni was mostly segregated at the interface. The doped Ni mainly existed in the Cu6Sn5 IMC layer region as formed (Cu,Ni)6Sn5, and the Cu 3Sn IMC region contains less Ni. Both different IMC morphologies and crack locations were discussed on the basis of the lattice distortion relaxation. The Cu6Sn5 peninsula IMC growth was discussed that was caused by the compression stress of itself, and the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu crack inside the IMC was also discussed that was caused by the difference stress between Cu6Sn5 (compression stress) and Cu3Sn (tensile stress). Namely, the doped Ni was substituted for the Cu site of Cu6Sn5 and their lattice distortions were relaxed due to the smaller atomic radius of Ni compared with Cu. The stress difference between (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 and Cu3Sn was relieved by the Ni substitutions, which improved the drop shock reliability in BGA of Sn1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni.
AB - The drop shock reliability of an Sn-Ag-Cu solder system in ball grid array (BGA) interconnects were improved by selecting a lower Ag chemical content and the addition of a small amount of Ni. The drop shock reliability of Sn-Ag-Cu solder in BGA interconnects was enhanced by the addition of small amount of Ni, and LF35(Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni) had twice better drop shock reliability than LF45(Sn-3.0Ag0.5Cu). One of the main reasons is the solder with lower Ag contents in the Sn-Ag-Cu solder system demonstrated softer properties in terms of hardness. Different intermetallic compound (IMC) layer morphologies were found on the Cu electrodes after reflow between Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu, in which the former is smooth IMC and the latter is like a peninsula IMC. Different cracks modes were also detected. Cracks in Sn-1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni were mainly inside solder and cracks in Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu were near the solder/electrode interface for all drop shocks tested. From SEM, EPMA mapping and TEM analysis, the small amount of doped Ni was mostly segregated at the interface. The doped Ni mainly existed in the Cu6Sn5 IMC layer region as formed (Cu,Ni)6Sn5, and the Cu 3Sn IMC region contains less Ni. Both different IMC morphologies and crack locations were discussed on the basis of the lattice distortion relaxation. The Cu6Sn5 peninsula IMC growth was discussed that was caused by the compression stress of itself, and the Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu crack inside the IMC was also discussed that was caused by the difference stress between Cu6Sn5 (compression stress) and Cu3Sn (tensile stress). Namely, the doped Ni was substituted for the Cu site of Cu6Sn5 and their lattice distortions were relaxed due to the smaller atomic radius of Ni compared with Cu. The stress difference between (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 and Cu3Sn was relieved by the Ni substitutions, which improved the drop shock reliability in BGA of Sn1.2Ag-0.5Cu-Ni.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845597333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845597333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645629
DO - 10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645629
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33845597333
SN - 1424401526
SN - 9781424401529
T3 - Proceedings - Electronic Components and Technology Conference
SP - 78
EP - 84
BT - Proceedings - IEEE 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference
T2 - IEEE 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference
Y2 - 30 May 2006 through 2 June 2006
ER -