TY - JOUR
T1 - Is ability grouping beneficial or detrimental to Japanese ESP students' English language proficiency development?
AU - Sheppard, Chris
AU - Manalo, Emmanuel
AU - Henning, Marcus
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant-in-aid ( 15H01976 ) received from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science . We would also like to thank the Center for English Language Education in Science and Engineering (CELESE) at Waseda University and its students for their support of this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - This study investigated whether ability grouping was beneficial to Japanese university science and engineering students who had taken compulsory ESP (English for specific purposes) courses. By examining the change in their standardized general proficiency test scores (using the Test of English for International Communication or TOEIC) and using data from across six years of enrollment (a cohort of 13,000 students), the performance of students who had been placed into a broader band of English ability (i.e., less similar language proficiency) was compared with the performance of students who had been placed into a narrower band (i.e., more similar language proficiency). Findings showed that ability grouping benefited less proficient learners. By contrast, ability grouping did not appear to be beneficial for more proficient learners. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed, including organizational and instructional features of the program of study the students were taking, and the likely effects of ability grouping on students' academic self-concept.
AB - This study investigated whether ability grouping was beneficial to Japanese university science and engineering students who had taken compulsory ESP (English for specific purposes) courses. By examining the change in their standardized general proficiency test scores (using the Test of English for International Communication or TOEIC) and using data from across six years of enrollment (a cohort of 13,000 students), the performance of students who had been placed into a broader band of English ability (i.e., less similar language proficiency) was compared with the performance of students who had been placed into a narrower band (i.e., more similar language proficiency). Findings showed that ability grouping benefited less proficient learners. By contrast, ability grouping did not appear to be beneficial for more proficient learners. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed, including organizational and instructional features of the program of study the students were taking, and the likely effects of ability grouping on students' academic self-concept.
KW - Ability grouping
KW - Academic self-concept
KW - ESP
KW - Placement
KW - Second language program design
KW - Tracking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033552418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033552418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85033552418
SN - 0889-4906
VL - 49
SP - 39
EP - 48
JO - English for Specific Purposes
JF - English for Specific Purposes
ER -