TY - JOUR
T1 - Is insurance normal or inferior? -A regret theoretical approach-
AU - Fujii, Yoichiro
AU - Okura, Mahito
AU - Osaki, Yusuke
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank an anonymous referee for her or his useful comments, and Jie Qin and the participants at the third East Asia Risk and Insurance Management Workshop and the 20th Annual Conference of the Asia-Pacific Risk and Insurance Association for their helpful comments on earlier versions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP17K03637 (Yoichiro Fujii), JP15K03727 (Mahito Okura), JP26705004 (Yusuke Osaki) and JP20H01519 (Yoichiro Fujii and Yusuke Osaki).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - This study considers how changes in wealth affect insurance demand when individuals suffer disutility from regret. Anticipated regret stems from a comparison between the ex-post maximum and actual wealth. We consider a situation wherein individuals maximize their expected utility incorporating anticipated regret. The wealth effect on insurance demand can be classified into the risk and the regret effects. These effects are determined by the properties of the utility function and the regret function. We show that insurance can be normal when individuals place weight on anticipated regret, even though the utility function exhibit decreasing absolute risk aversion. This result indicates that regret theory is a possible explanation to the wealth effect puzzle, in which insurance is normal from empirical observation, but it should be inferior by theoretical prediction under expected utility theory.
AB - This study considers how changes in wealth affect insurance demand when individuals suffer disutility from regret. Anticipated regret stems from a comparison between the ex-post maximum and actual wealth. We consider a situation wherein individuals maximize their expected utility incorporating anticipated regret. The wealth effect on insurance demand can be classified into the risk and the regret effects. These effects are determined by the properties of the utility function and the regret function. We show that insurance can be normal when individuals place weight on anticipated regret, even though the utility function exhibit decreasing absolute risk aversion. This result indicates that regret theory is a possible explanation to the wealth effect puzzle, in which insurance is normal from empirical observation, but it should be inferior by theoretical prediction under expected utility theory.
KW - Decreasing absolute risk aversion
KW - Demand shift
KW - Regret sensitivity
KW - Wealth effect puzzle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117847675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117847675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.najef.2021.101559
DO - 10.1016/j.najef.2021.101559
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117847675
SN - 1062-9408
VL - 58
JO - North American Journal of Economics and Finance
JF - North American Journal of Economics and Finance
M1 - 101559
ER -