TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed Reality Needle Guidance Application on Smartglasses Without Pre-procedural CT Image Import with Manually Matching Coordinate Systems
AU - Morita, Satoru
AU - Suzuki, Kazufumi
AU - Yamamoto, Takahiro
AU - Kunihara, Motoki
AU - Hashimoto, Hiroyuki
AU - Ito, Kayo
AU - Fujii, Shuhei
AU - Ohya, Jun
AU - Masamune, Ken
AU - Sakai, Shuji
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Yu Nunokawa and Hiroshi Yamazaki of Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital for technical assistance with the experiments. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K07648.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Purpose: To develop and assess the accuracy of a mixed reality (MR) needle guidance application on smartglasses. Materials and Methods: An MR needle guidance application on HoloLens2, without pre-procedural CT image reconstruction or import by manually matching the spatial and MR coordinate systems, was developed. First, the accuracy of the target locations in the image overlay at 63 points arranged on a 45 × 35 × 21 cm box and needle angles from 0° to 80°, placed using the MR application, was verified. The needle placement errors from 12 different entry points in a phantom by seven operators (four physicians and three non-physicians) were compared using a linear mixed model between the MR guidance and conventional methods using protractors. Results: The average errors of the target locations and needle angles placed using the MR application were 5.9 ± 2.6 mm and 2.3 ± 1.7°, respectively. The average needle insertion error using the MR guidance was slightly smaller compared to that using the conventional method (8.4 ± 4.0 mm vs. 9.6 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.091), particularly in the out-of-plane approach (9.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 12.3 ± 4.6 mm, p = 0.003). The procedural time was longer with MR guidance than with the conventional method (412 ± 134 s vs. 219 ± 66 s, p < 0.001). Conclusion: MR needle guidance without pre-procedural CT image import is feasible when matching coordinate systems, and the accuracy of needle insertion is slightly better than that of the conventional method.
AB - Purpose: To develop and assess the accuracy of a mixed reality (MR) needle guidance application on smartglasses. Materials and Methods: An MR needle guidance application on HoloLens2, without pre-procedural CT image reconstruction or import by manually matching the spatial and MR coordinate systems, was developed. First, the accuracy of the target locations in the image overlay at 63 points arranged on a 45 × 35 × 21 cm box and needle angles from 0° to 80°, placed using the MR application, was verified. The needle placement errors from 12 different entry points in a phantom by seven operators (four physicians and three non-physicians) were compared using a linear mixed model between the MR guidance and conventional methods using protractors. Results: The average errors of the target locations and needle angles placed using the MR application were 5.9 ± 2.6 mm and 2.3 ± 1.7°, respectively. The average needle insertion error using the MR guidance was slightly smaller compared to that using the conventional method (8.4 ± 4.0 mm vs. 9.6 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.091), particularly in the out-of-plane approach (9.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 12.3 ± 4.6 mm, p = 0.003). The procedural time was longer with MR guidance than with the conventional method (412 ± 134 s vs. 219 ± 66 s, p < 0.001). Conclusion: MR needle guidance without pre-procedural CT image import is feasible when matching coordinate systems, and the accuracy of needle insertion is slightly better than that of the conventional method.
KW - Augmented reality
KW - Interventional radiology
KW - Mixed reality
KW - Needle guidance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122804111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122804111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00270-021-03029-3
DO - 10.1007/s00270-021-03029-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 35022858
AN - SCOPUS:85122804111
SN - 0174-1551
VL - 45
SP - 349
EP - 356
JO - Cardiovascular Radiology
JF - Cardiovascular Radiology
IS - 3
ER -