Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma: A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter

Takanobu Kinjo*, Masahiro Morioka

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter's desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a "narrative responsibility," namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-99
Number of pages9
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Apr
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain death in Japan
  • Moral dilemma
  • Narrative dilemma
  • Narrative ethics
  • Narrative responsibility
  • Organ donation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma: A case study of a family's decision about a brain-dead daughter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this