Over-nominating candidates, undermining the party: The collective action problem under SNTV in Japan

Kuniaki Nemoto*, Robert Pekkanen, Ellis Krauss

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)


    Any political party has a profound interest in maximizing seats, which in turn requires running the optimum number of candidates. However, to do this presumes solving a collective action problem among self-interested party members or leaders, and is deeply conditioned by the electoral system. The case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party under the Single Non-Transferable Vote electoral system provides a superb illustration of how party leaders, even in a famously electorally successful party, will be unable to solve these dilemmas because of key facilitating institutions: first, party president selection rules; second, prime ministerial control over allocation of positions; third, a weak party label. Contrary to existing literature, we find ambitious factions consistently nominated too many candidates - deliberately risking the party's losing seats. We draw attention to the sources of party strength in a novel way, and to how party rules interact with electoral systems to shape both parties and politics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)740-750
    Number of pages11
    JournalParty Politics
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2014


    • Electoral systems
    • factionalism
    • Japan
    • Liberal Democratic Party

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Over-nominating candidates, undermining the party: The collective action problem under SNTV in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this