TY - JOUR
T1 - Partial smoking ban and secondhand smoke exposure in Japan
AU - Zeng, Sen
AU - Noguchi, Haruko
AU - Shimokawa, Satoru
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by Waseda University Research Initiatives, entitled “Empirical and theoretical research for social welfare in sustainable society–Inheritance of human capital beyond ‘an individual’ and ‘a generation’ ” (PI: Haruko Noguchi); Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Project: “Effects of the prevention policy of lifestyle related disease on labour productivity and macro economy from viewpoint of cost-effective analysis” (PI: Haruko Noguchi). This research has received official approval to use the secondary data from the Statistics and Information Department of the MHLW under Tohatsu-0507-3 as of 7 May 2018. Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the Statistics and Information Department of the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for providing available data.
Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by Waseda University Research Initiatives, entitled “Empirical and theoretical research for social welfare in sustainable society–Inheritance of human capital beyond ‘an individual’ and ‘a generation’ ” (PI: Haruko Noguchi); Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research Project: “Effects of the prevention policy of lifestyle related disease on labour productivity and macro economy from viewpoint of cost-effective analysis” (PI: Haruko Noguchi). This research has received official approval to use the secondary data from the Statistics and Information Department of the MHLW under Tohatsu-0507-3 as of 7 May 2018.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Implementing smoking bans is a worldwide common practice for tobacco control. However, if the policy prohibits smoking partially rather than comprehensively, it may increase nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in nonprohibited places. This paper investigates how a partial smoking ban affected nonsmokers’ SHS exposure (measured by frequency of having exposure to SHS in days per month) in households, workplaces, and restaurants by examining the case of a partial smoking ban introduced in a large Japanese prefecture in 2013. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS) in 2010, 2013, and 2016 (n = 30,244) and the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions (CSLC) from 2001 to 2016 (n = 2,366,896), this paper employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach. We found that the partial smoking ban significantly increased their SHS exposure in households and workplaces by 2.64 days and 4.70 days per month, respectively, while it did not change nonsmokers’ SHS exposure in restaurants. The results imply that the smoking ban displaced smokers from public places to private places. We also found that neither smokers’ smoking status nor smoking intensity changed significantly after implementing the partial smoking ban. Comprehensive smoking bans are needed to better protect nonsmokers from SHS exposure.
AB - Implementing smoking bans is a worldwide common practice for tobacco control. However, if the policy prohibits smoking partially rather than comprehensively, it may increase nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in nonprohibited places. This paper investigates how a partial smoking ban affected nonsmokers’ SHS exposure (measured by frequency of having exposure to SHS in days per month) in households, workplaces, and restaurants by examining the case of a partial smoking ban introduced in a large Japanese prefecture in 2013. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHNS) in 2010, 2013, and 2016 (n = 30,244) and the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions (CSLC) from 2001 to 2016 (n = 2,366,896), this paper employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach. We found that the partial smoking ban significantly increased their SHS exposure in households and workplaces by 2.64 days and 4.70 days per month, respectively, while it did not change nonsmokers’ SHS exposure in restaurants. The results imply that the smoking ban displaced smokers from public places to private places. We also found that neither smokers’ smoking status nor smoking intensity changed significantly after implementing the partial smoking ban. Comprehensive smoking bans are needed to better protect nonsmokers from SHS exposure.
KW - Difference-in-differences
KW - Japan
KW - Partial smoking ban
KW - Secondhand smoke exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072144816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072144816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16152804
DO - 10.3390/ijerph16152804
M3 - Article
C2 - 31390797
AN - SCOPUS:85072144816
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 16
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 15
M1 - 2804
ER -