TY - JOUR
T1 - Payment instruments and collateral in the interbank payment system
AU - Tomura, Hajime
N1 - Funding Information:
I thank three anonymous referees and the associate editor for their comments and suggestions, and also Hiroki Arato, Ryoji Hiraguchi, Hiroshi Fujiki, Jamie McAndrews, Will Roberds, Masaya Sakuragawa, Hidehiko Ishihara, Ken-Ichi Shimomura, Eiichi Miyagawa, Takashi Shimizu, and participants in various seminars for their comments. I am also grateful for financial support from JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research ( 24223003 , 16K03756 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s)
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - This paper presents a three-period model to analyze why banks need bank reserves despite the presence of other liquid assets, such as Treasury securities. The model shows that if a pair of banks settle bank transfers between them without the central bank, a hold-up problem occurs when they bargain over the terms of settlement. This result stems from the confidentiality of bank-transfer requests, which makes it necessary for a depositor to retain an outside option to withdraw cash to enforce a bank-transfer request in a deposit contract. In light of this result, the large value payment system operated by the central bank can be regarded as an implicit interbank settlement contract to prevent a hold-up problem. In this contract, the central bank is characterized as the custodian of collateral. Bank reserves correspond to the balances of liquid collateral that banks submit to the central bank. This result can explain the rate-of-return dominance puzzle as well as why the central bank must replace liquid assets with bank reserves. The optimal implicit contract features a type of deferred net settlement in which the value of bank reserves transferred between banks is smaller than the net value of bank transfers to be settled.
AB - This paper presents a three-period model to analyze why banks need bank reserves despite the presence of other liquid assets, such as Treasury securities. The model shows that if a pair of banks settle bank transfers between them without the central bank, a hold-up problem occurs when they bargain over the terms of settlement. This result stems from the confidentiality of bank-transfer requests, which makes it necessary for a depositor to retain an outside option to withdraw cash to enforce a bank-transfer request in a deposit contract. In light of this result, the large value payment system operated by the central bank can be regarded as an implicit interbank settlement contract to prevent a hold-up problem. In this contract, the central bank is characterized as the custodian of collateral. Bank reserves correspond to the balances of liquid collateral that banks submit to the central bank. This result can explain the rate-of-return dominance puzzle as well as why the central bank must replace liquid assets with bank reserves. The optimal implicit contract features a type of deferred net settlement in which the value of bank reserves transferred between banks is smaller than the net value of bank transfers to be settled.
KW - Bank reserves
KW - Interbank money market
KW - Large value payment system
KW - Privacy
KW - Rate-of-return dominance puzzle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052914981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052914981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jet.2018.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jet.2018.08.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052914981
SN - 0022-0531
VL - 178
SP - 82
EP - 104
JO - Journal of Economic Theory
JF - Journal of Economic Theory
ER -