Register length analysis and VLSI optimization of VBS hadamard transform in H.264/AVC

Zhenyu Liu*, Junwei Zhou, Dongsheng Wang, Takeshi Ikenaga

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fidelity range extensions of H.264/AVC adopt variable block size (VBS) transform techniques to employ 8× 8/4×4 Hadamard transforms adaptively during the fractional motion estimation. In this literature, the hardwired VBS Hadamard transform accelerator is developed with the following contributions: 1) developed a hardware reusing scheme between 8×8 and 4×4 transforms within the architecture design; 2) devised the intermediate bit-truncation algorithm to reduce the hardware cost while maintaining the computational precision well; and 3) reduced the bit-width of sum of absolute transformed differences (SATD) value as compared to the primitive implementation, resulting in optimization in both power and hardware cost for the SATD generator implementation. With TSMC 0.18 μm CMOS technology, the experiments demonstrate that for each VBS Hadamard transform engine, 13.030.4% saving in hardware cost and 12.632.4% saving in power consumption are achieved, whereas the incurred coding quality loss is less than 0.2089 dB in terms of BDPSNR. From the aspect of the whole encoder implementation, and considering the parallelism in searching factional pixel candidates, the proposed strategies garner 2.03.9% overall gate count reduction.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5733398
Pages (from-to)601-610
Number of pages10
JournalIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 May

Keywords

  • FRExt
  • H.264/AVC
  • VLSI
  • hadamard transform
  • variable block size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Media Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Register length analysis and VLSI optimization of VBS hadamard transform in H.264/AVC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this