Reproducibility and reliability of two kinds of soft tissue stiffness meter

Akira Takanashi*, Hiroshi Karasuno, Kotomi Shiota, Takayuki Fujiwara, Ryo Konuma, Koji Abe, Yoshiro Ogoma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this study we assessed two models of soft tissue stiffness meter (TRY-ALL Corporation NEUTONE TDM-N1 and TDM-NA1; STSM-with alarm, and without alarm) for inter/intra-rater reproducibility and reliability. In Experiment 1, subjects comprising 21 physical therapists (PT) or occupational therapists (OT) measured the surface stiffness of a polyurethane test piece with known physical properties using the STSM with no alarm (NI). They each took 7 consecutive readings at the same site. In Experiment 2, 22 PT or OT used the same model of STSM with an alarm (NA1) to measure the stiffness of the same test piece at the same site. The intra-subject reproducibility was high: NI coefficient of variation % (CV) = 2.9 ± 1.3%; NA1, CV= 1.5 ± 0.4%. In addition, the inter-subject reliability was high; N1, Intraclass correlation coefficients: ICC (2.1) (2.7) =0.56, 0.9; NA1, ICC (2.1) (2.7) = 0.42, 0.83. Thus, it seems reasonable to conclude that STSM is a reliable and useful device for objective quantitative evaluation of soft tissue stiffness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-300
Number of pages4
JournalRigakuryoho Kagaku
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Reliability
  • Reproducibility
  • Soft tissue stiffness meter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reproducibility and reliability of two kinds of soft tissue stiffness meter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this