Social construction of skill: an analytical approach toward the question of skill in cross-border labour mobilities

Gracia Liu-Farrer*, Brenda S. Yeoh, Michiel Baas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting labour migrants based on skill has become a widely practised migration policy in many countries around the world. Since the late twentieth century, research on ‘skilled’ and ‘highly skilled’ migration has raised important questions about the value and ethics of skill-based labour mobility. More recent research has begun to question the concept of skill and skill categorisation in both government policy and academic research. Taking the view that migrants’ skill is socially constructed, we centre our discussion on three questions: Who are the arbitrators of skill? What constitutes skill? And how is skill constructed in the migration process and in turn, how does skill affect the mobility? We show that diverse actors are involved in the process of identifying, evaluating and shaping migrant skill. The interpretation of migrants’ skill is frequently distorted by their ascriptive characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender and nationality, reflecting the influence of colonial legacy, global inequality as well as social stratification. Finally, this special issue emphasises the complex, and frequently reciprocal, relationship between skill and mobility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2237-2251
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume47
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Cross-border labour mobility
  • skill acquisition
  • skill arbitrator
  • skill recognition
  • skilled migration
  • social construction of skill

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social construction of skill: an analytical approach toward the question of skill in cross-border labour mobilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this