TY - JOUR
T1 - Solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries
T2 - Advances, challenges and perspectives
AU - Ding, Bing
AU - Wang, Jie
AU - Fan, Zengjie
AU - Chen, Shuang
AU - Lin, Qingyang
AU - Lu, Xiangjun
AU - Dou, Hui
AU - Kumar Nanjundan, Ashok
AU - Yushin, Gleb
AU - Zhang, Xiaogang
AU - Yamauchi, Yusuke
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20170778 ), Natural Science Foundation of China ( 21905134 , U1802256 , 51672128 , 21773118 and 21875107 ), Prospective Joint Research Project of Cooperative Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province ( BE2018122 ), Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellow (Grant FT150100479 ) and ARC-Linkage ( LP180100429 ). B.D. and J.W. would like to gratefully acknowledge the JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship ( 18F18764 , 18F18038 ), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation ( 2018M632300 ), Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Precision and Micro-Manufacturing Technology , and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. NS2018036 ). This work was performed in part at the Queensland node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility, a company established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy to provide nano and microfabrication facilities for Australia’s researchers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Secondary batteries with high energy density, high specific energy and long cycle life have attracted increasing research attention as required for ground and aerial electric vehicles and large-scale stationary energy-storage. Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are considered as a particularly promising candidate because of their high theoretical performance and low cost of active materials. In spite of the recent progress in both fundamental understanding and developments of electrode and electrolyte materials, the practical use of liquid electrolyte-based Li–S batteries is still hindered by their poor cycling performance and safety concerns. Solid-state Li–S batteries have the potential to overcome these challenges. In this review, the mechanisms of Li ion transport and the basic requirements of solid-state electrolytes are discussed. We focus on recent advances in various solid-state Li–S battery systems, from quasi-solid-state to all-solid-state Li–S batteries. We also describe the remaining challenges and plausible solutions, including improved designs and compositions of electrode materials, solid-state electrolytes and the electrode/electrolyte interfaces. Though many fundamental and technological issues still need to be resolved to develop commercially viable technologies, solid-state Li–S batteries offer an attractive opportunity to address the present limitations.
AB - Secondary batteries with high energy density, high specific energy and long cycle life have attracted increasing research attention as required for ground and aerial electric vehicles and large-scale stationary energy-storage. Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are considered as a particularly promising candidate because of their high theoretical performance and low cost of active materials. In spite of the recent progress in both fundamental understanding and developments of electrode and electrolyte materials, the practical use of liquid electrolyte-based Li–S batteries is still hindered by their poor cycling performance and safety concerns. Solid-state Li–S batteries have the potential to overcome these challenges. In this review, the mechanisms of Li ion transport and the basic requirements of solid-state electrolytes are discussed. We focus on recent advances in various solid-state Li–S battery systems, from quasi-solid-state to all-solid-state Li–S batteries. We also describe the remaining challenges and plausible solutions, including improved designs and compositions of electrode materials, solid-state electrolytes and the electrode/electrolyte interfaces. Though many fundamental and technological issues still need to be resolved to develop commercially viable technologies, solid-state Li–S batteries offer an attractive opportunity to address the present limitations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094810828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094810828&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.05.020
DO - 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.05.020
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85094810828
SN - 1369-7021
VL - 40
SP - 114
EP - 131
JO - Materials Today
JF - Materials Today
ER -