TY - JOUR
T1 - The evaluation of the postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45
T2 - a nationwide multi-institutional study
AU - Lee, Sang Woong
AU - Kaji, Masahide
AU - Uenosono, Yoshikazu
AU - Kano, Mikihiro
AU - Shimizu, Hisashi
AU - Noguchi, Takuya
AU - Ueda, Shugo
AU - Nobuoka, Takayuki
AU - Oshio, Atsushi
AU - Nakada, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by grants from the Jikei University and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. The funding sources had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Purpose: This retrospective nationwide survey investigated the quality of life (QOL) of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer after gastrectomy using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. Methods: The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 comprises 45 questions classified into symptoms, living status, and QOL domains. A total of 1950 gastrectomized patients with upper-third gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer returned the completed forms. Among them, 224 eligible patients with esophagogastric junction cancer were selected, including 86, 120, and 18 patients who underwent total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy (reconstruction-esophagogastrostomy: 56; double-tract method: 51), and other procedures, respectively. Results: The postoperative period was significantly shorter (47 ± 30 vs. 34 ± 30 months, p = 0.002), and the rates of early-stage disease and minimally invasive approaches significantly higher (both p < 0.001) in the proximal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group. Despite advantageous background factors for proximal gastrectomy, the postoperative QOL did not differ markedly between the groups. Compared to patients who underwent reconstruction with the double-tract method, patients who underwent esophagogastrostomy had significantly larger remnant stomachs but a similar QOL. Conclusion: Even with total gastrectomy, a postoperative QOL comparable to that with proximal gastrectomy can be maintained. Clarifying the optimal reconstruction methods for proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer is warranted. Trial registration: This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; registration number: 000032221).
AB - Purpose: This retrospective nationwide survey investigated the quality of life (QOL) of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer after gastrectomy using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. Methods: The Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 comprises 45 questions classified into symptoms, living status, and QOL domains. A total of 1950 gastrectomized patients with upper-third gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer returned the completed forms. Among them, 224 eligible patients with esophagogastric junction cancer were selected, including 86, 120, and 18 patients who underwent total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy (reconstruction-esophagogastrostomy: 56; double-tract method: 51), and other procedures, respectively. Results: The postoperative period was significantly shorter (47 ± 30 vs. 34 ± 30 months, p = 0.002), and the rates of early-stage disease and minimally invasive approaches significantly higher (both p < 0.001) in the proximal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group. Despite advantageous background factors for proximal gastrectomy, the postoperative QOL did not differ markedly between the groups. Compared to patients who underwent reconstruction with the double-tract method, patients who underwent esophagogastrostomy had significantly larger remnant stomachs but a similar QOL. Conclusion: Even with total gastrectomy, a postoperative QOL comparable to that with proximal gastrectomy can be maintained. Clarifying the optimal reconstruction methods for proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer is warranted. Trial registration: This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; registration number: 000032221).
KW - Gastrectomy
KW - Postgastrectomy syndrome
KW - Quality of life
KW - Questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118510176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118510176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-021-02400-8
DO - 10.1007/s00595-021-02400-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34734320
AN - SCOPUS:85118510176
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 52
SP - 832
EP - 843
JO - Surgery Today
JF - Surgery Today
IS - 5
ER -