A comparison between agent-based and GIS-based tsunami evacuation simulations: a case study for Tofino, BC

Joseph Kim*, Tomoyuki Takabatake, Ioan Nistor, Tomoya Shibayama

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

抄録

Soft measures such as evacuation planning are recommended to mitigate the loss of life during tsunamis. Two types of evacuation models are widely used: (i) agent-based modelling (ABM) defines sets of rules that individual agents in a simulation follow during a simulated evacuation; and (ii) geographical information systems (GIS) are more accessible to city planners, but cannot incorporate the dynamic behaviours found in ABMs. The two evacuation modelling methodologies were compared through a case study by assessing the state of evacuation preparedness and investigating potential mitigation options. The two models showed different magnitudes for mortality rates and facility demand but had similar trends. Both models agreed on the best solution to reduce the loss of life for the community. GIS may serve as a useful tool for initial investigation or as a validation tool for ABMs. ABMs are recommended for use when modelling evacuation until GIS methodologies are further developed.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)511-526
ページ数16
ジャーナルCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering
49
4
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 土木構造工学
  • 環境科学(全般)

フィンガープリント

「A comparison between agent-based and GIS-based tsunami evacuation simulations: a case study for Tofino, BC」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル