TY - JOUR
T1 - A critical social perspective on deep sea mining
T2 - Lessons from the emergent industry in Japan
AU - Carver, R.
AU - Childs, J.
AU - Steinberg, P.
AU - Mabon, L.
AU - Matsuda, H.
AU - Squire, R.
AU - McLellan, B.
AU - Esteban, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was made possible by generous funding by an ESRC UK - Japan SSH Connections Grant (reference: ES/S012974/1 ).
Funding Information:
This research was made possible by generous funding by an ESRC UK-Japan SSH Connections Grant (reference: ES/S012974/1). Leslie Mabon participated in the writing of this paper as part of his activities as a Future Earth Coasts Fellow. A paper that later formed part of this article was presented in draft form by Miguel Esteban as part of his programme of research activities at the Research Institute of Sustainable Future Society, Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Japan. Thanks are extended to Ran Motoori at Kyoto University for translating elements of the GOJ's Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Programme. We also wish to thank project members of the Japanese Cross Ministierial Strategic Innovation Program (SIP) ?Next-Generation Marine Resources Survey Technology? for information about ISO standards.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - In 2017 the Japanese government reported that its state-owned mining company had successfully extracted zinc from the seabed off the coast of Okinawa. This piloting of technology is currently the world's only example of large-scale extractive activity operating at such depths. Alongside Japan's innovations, the global deep sea mining (DSM) industry is moving towards commercial viability. This paper draws upon critical theoretical perspectives to better understand the complex debates being provoked. While there has been an increasing range of scholarship focusing on DSM from both the natural and social sciences, this paper cautions that the social sciences are not merely tools for assessing public and stakeholder acceptability. They require and deserve a central role in defining the purpose, nature and scope of commercial DSM. This paper therefore develops an approach that seeks to diversify and broaden engagements with DSM and that is well-placed to navigate the political questions that emerge from mining on the seabed. These perspectives also enable us to interrogate claims that DSM offers greater ‘sustainability’ than terrestrial mining does. This paper's interdisciplinary approach draws on empirical reference to, and examples from, the Japanese context, highlighting four main areas of concern for DSM: geography, geopolitics, law and political economy. These areas of critical enquiry reveal DSM's complexities and caution against perceiving DSM as a singular phenomenon. The emergent complex and multi-scalar questions from seabed mining therefore require a more holistic approach. Mining the seabed produces, and is underpinned by, a multitude of social, cultural and political dimensions and the potential consequences of DSM will not be experienced evenly. As this paper demonstrates, DSM is an interdisciplinary issue. The confines of disciplinary norms must therefore be exceeded to facilitate a deeper understanding of both the practices of DSM and their consequences.
AB - In 2017 the Japanese government reported that its state-owned mining company had successfully extracted zinc from the seabed off the coast of Okinawa. This piloting of technology is currently the world's only example of large-scale extractive activity operating at such depths. Alongside Japan's innovations, the global deep sea mining (DSM) industry is moving towards commercial viability. This paper draws upon critical theoretical perspectives to better understand the complex debates being provoked. While there has been an increasing range of scholarship focusing on DSM from both the natural and social sciences, this paper cautions that the social sciences are not merely tools for assessing public and stakeholder acceptability. They require and deserve a central role in defining the purpose, nature and scope of commercial DSM. This paper therefore develops an approach that seeks to diversify and broaden engagements with DSM and that is well-placed to navigate the political questions that emerge from mining on the seabed. These perspectives also enable us to interrogate claims that DSM offers greater ‘sustainability’ than terrestrial mining does. This paper's interdisciplinary approach draws on empirical reference to, and examples from, the Japanese context, highlighting four main areas of concern for DSM: geography, geopolitics, law and political economy. These areas of critical enquiry reveal DSM's complexities and caution against perceiving DSM as a singular phenomenon. The emergent complex and multi-scalar questions from seabed mining therefore require a more holistic approach. Mining the seabed produces, and is underpinned by, a multitude of social, cultural and political dimensions and the potential consequences of DSM will not be experienced evenly. As this paper demonstrates, DSM is an interdisciplinary issue. The confines of disciplinary norms must therefore be exceeded to facilitate a deeper understanding of both the practices of DSM and their consequences.
KW - Blue growth
KW - Deep sea mining
KW - Japan
KW - Resource politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084645311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084645311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105242
DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105242
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084645311
SN - 0964-5691
VL - 193
JO - Ocean and Coastal Management
JF - Ocean and Coastal Management
M1 - 105242
ER -