TY - JOUR
T1 - A socio-technical analysis of consumer preferences about energy systems applying a simulation-based approach
T2 - A case study of the Tokyo area
AU - Nakai, Miwa
AU - Okubo, Tatsuya
AU - Kikuchi, Yasunori
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - In consideration of forthcoming amendments to laws and regulations about Japan's energy systems, we conducted a socio-technical analysis to support discussions towards a consensus on socially acceptable and technologically feasible energy systems for Japan. Using a choice experiment survey, we analysed consumer preferences about the electricity supply in the Tokyo area. We found that consumers tend to purchase electricity from major providers with a renewable-energy component in the mix, which offers stable supply on cheap plans with little price volatility. Furthermore, they avoid nuclear power, and show a positive “willingness to pay” for regional power providers only after possible regional economic benefits are suggested. In our subsequent technical analysis, consumers’ estimated willingness-to-pay for the preferred nuclear-free and renewable energy options were compared with simulated electricity price changes in response to the roll-out of feasible energy systems technologies under different policy scenarios, using computational energy flow models. We found that simulated price increases from an immediate shutdown of nuclear plants and from feed-in tariffs for renewables would exceed consumers’ willingness-to-pay. Our approach of using survey- and simulation-based analyses jointly to facilitate informed discussions on energy system choices should lead to continuous improvements in public and policy discussions towards a consensus.
AB - In consideration of forthcoming amendments to laws and regulations about Japan's energy systems, we conducted a socio-technical analysis to support discussions towards a consensus on socially acceptable and technologically feasible energy systems for Japan. Using a choice experiment survey, we analysed consumer preferences about the electricity supply in the Tokyo area. We found that consumers tend to purchase electricity from major providers with a renewable-energy component in the mix, which offers stable supply on cheap plans with little price volatility. Furthermore, they avoid nuclear power, and show a positive “willingness to pay” for regional power providers only after possible regional economic benefits are suggested. In our subsequent technical analysis, consumers’ estimated willingness-to-pay for the preferred nuclear-free and renewable energy options were compared with simulated electricity price changes in response to the roll-out of feasible energy systems technologies under different policy scenarios, using computational energy flow models. We found that simulated price increases from an immediate shutdown of nuclear plants and from feed-in tariffs for renewables would exceed consumers’ willingness-to-pay. Our approach of using survey- and simulation-based analyses jointly to facilitate informed discussions on energy system choices should lead to continuous improvements in public and policy discussions towards a consensus.
KW - Choice experiment
KW - Consumer preference
KW - Simulation
KW - Socio-technical analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049343933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049343933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049343933
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 46
SP - 52
EP - 63
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
ER -