TY - JOUR
T1 - Ambiguity aversion in schizophrenia
T2 - An fMRI study of decision-making under risk and ambiguity
AU - Fujino, Junya
AU - Hirose, Kimito
AU - Tei, Shisei
AU - Kawada, Ryosaku
AU - Tsurumi, Kosuke
AU - Matsukawa, Noriko
AU - Miyata, Jun
AU - Sugihara, Genichi
AU - Yoshihara, Yujiro
AU - Ideno, Takashi
AU - Aso, Toshihiko
AU - Takemura, Kazuhisa
AU - Fukuyama, Hidenao
AU - Murai, Toshiya
AU - Takahashi, Hidehiko
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Young Scientists A 23680045 , Scientific Research A 24243061 , 15H01690 , B 15H04893 , C 26461767 , and S 22220003 ) and Grant-in-Aid for challenging Exploratory Research ( 16K13106 ); the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) (on innovative areas 23118004 , 23120009 , 16H06572 , 16H01504 ); the Uehara Memorial Foundation ; the Smoking Research Foundation ; the Takeda Science Foundation ; Kobayashi Magobei Memorial Foundation ; Japan Foundation for Aging and Health ; and a Japan-US Brain Research Cooperation Program grant. A part of this study is the result of Development of BMI Technologies for Clinical Application carried out under the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences by MEXT and “Research and development of technology for enhancing functional recovery of elderly and disabled people based on non-invasive brain imaging and robotic assistive devices”, the Commissioned Research of National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan. These agencies had no further role in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - When making decisions in everyday life, we often have to choose between uncertain outcomes. Economic studies have demonstrated that healthy people tend to prefer options with known probabilities (risk) than those with unknown probabilities (ambiguity), which is referred to as “ambiguity aversion.” However, it remains unclear how patients with schizophrenia behave under ambiguity, despite growing evidence of their altered decision-making under uncertainty. In this study, combining economic tools and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we assessed the attitudes toward risk/ambiguity and investigated the neural correlates during decision-making under risk/ambiguity in schizophrenia. Although no significant difference in attitudes under risk was observed, patients with schizophrenia chose ambiguity significantly more often than the healthy controls. Attitudes under risk and ambiguity did not correlate across patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, unlike in the healthy controls, activation of the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex was not increased during decision-making under ambiguity compared to under risk in schizophrenia. These results suggest that ambiguity aversion, a well-established subjective bias, is attenuated in patients with schizophrenia, highlighting the need to distinguish between risk and ambiguity when assessing decision-making under these situations. Our findings, comprising important clinical implications, contribute to improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying altered decision-making in patients with schizophrenia.
AB - When making decisions in everyday life, we often have to choose between uncertain outcomes. Economic studies have demonstrated that healthy people tend to prefer options with known probabilities (risk) than those with unknown probabilities (ambiguity), which is referred to as “ambiguity aversion.” However, it remains unclear how patients with schizophrenia behave under ambiguity, despite growing evidence of their altered decision-making under uncertainty. In this study, combining economic tools and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we assessed the attitudes toward risk/ambiguity and investigated the neural correlates during decision-making under risk/ambiguity in schizophrenia. Although no significant difference in attitudes under risk was observed, patients with schizophrenia chose ambiguity significantly more often than the healthy controls. Attitudes under risk and ambiguity did not correlate across patients with schizophrenia. Furthermore, unlike in the healthy controls, activation of the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex was not increased during decision-making under ambiguity compared to under risk in schizophrenia. These results suggest that ambiguity aversion, a well-established subjective bias, is attenuated in patients with schizophrenia, highlighting the need to distinguish between risk and ambiguity when assessing decision-making under these situations. Our findings, comprising important clinical implications, contribute to improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying altered decision-making in patients with schizophrenia.
KW - Ambiguity
KW - Decision-making
KW - Functional magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Orbitofrontal cortex
KW - Risk
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995450985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995450985&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 27623361
AN - SCOPUS:84995450985
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 178
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Schizophrenia Research
JF - Schizophrenia Research
IS - 1-3
ER -