TY - JOUR
T1 - An international study on attitudes and opinions regarding female sports medicine physicians during pregnancy and the postpartum period
AU - Tsukahara, Yuka
AU - Novak, Melissa
AU - Takei, Seira
AU - Asif, Irfan M.
AU - Yamasawa, Fumihiro
AU - Torii, Suguru
AU - Akama, Takao
AU - Matsumoto, Hideo
AU - Day, Carly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objectives: Supporting female sports medicine physicians to simultaneously be mothers and pursue professional careers is crucial to maintain gender diversity in sports medicine physicians. The purpose of this study is to understand the attitudes toward female sports medicine physicians during pregnancy and postpartum. Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to sports medicine physicians practicing in 51 different countries. They were asked how comfortable they felt with female sports medicine physicians working on the sidelines of sporting events during pregnancy, if the female sports medicine physicians were as productive as their male counterparts after giving birth, and how satisfied they were with the percentage of female sports medicine physicians in their country. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables. Results: In total, 1193 physicians (380 [31.9%] female) were included for analysis. Physicians in Asia were the least comfortable with pregnant sports medicine physicians working on the sidelines and those in North America were the most comfortable (odds ratio = 0.28 and 2.51, 95% confidence interval 0.18–0.44 and 1.55–4.06, respectively). More experienced sports medicine physicians (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.03; p < 0.05) and divorced physicians (odds ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.91; p < 0.05) were less comfortable with pregnant female sports medicine physicians working on sidelines, and those trained in orthopedics were less likely to agree that female sports medicine physicians were equally as productive as male counterparts postpartum (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.88; p < 0.05). Female physicians were less satisfied with the percentage of female sports medicine physicians in their country (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.60; p < 0.01) than their male counterparts. Conclusions: Female sports medicine physicians may experience bias in their practice during pregnancy and postpartum.
AB - Objectives: Supporting female sports medicine physicians to simultaneously be mothers and pursue professional careers is crucial to maintain gender diversity in sports medicine physicians. The purpose of this study is to understand the attitudes toward female sports medicine physicians during pregnancy and postpartum. Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to sports medicine physicians practicing in 51 different countries. They were asked how comfortable they felt with female sports medicine physicians working on the sidelines of sporting events during pregnancy, if the female sports medicine physicians were as productive as their male counterparts after giving birth, and how satisfied they were with the percentage of female sports medicine physicians in their country. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables. Results: In total, 1193 physicians (380 [31.9%] female) were included for analysis. Physicians in Asia were the least comfortable with pregnant sports medicine physicians working on the sidelines and those in North America were the most comfortable (odds ratio = 0.28 and 2.51, 95% confidence interval 0.18–0.44 and 1.55–4.06, respectively). More experienced sports medicine physicians (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.03; p < 0.05) and divorced physicians (odds ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.12–0.91; p < 0.05) were less comfortable with pregnant female sports medicine physicians working on sidelines, and those trained in orthopedics were less likely to agree that female sports medicine physicians were equally as productive as male counterparts postpartum (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.88; p < 0.05). Female physicians were less satisfied with the percentage of female sports medicine physicians in their country (odds ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.60; p < 0.01) than their male counterparts. Conclusions: Female sports medicine physicians may experience bias in their practice during pregnancy and postpartum.
KW - Sports medicine
KW - gender bias
KW - postpartum period
KW - pregnancy
KW - sexism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144083556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144083556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00913847.2022.2154624
DO - 10.1080/00913847.2022.2154624
M3 - Article
C2 - 36460302
AN - SCOPUS:85144083556
SN - 0091-3847
JO - Physician and Sportsmedicine
JF - Physician and Sportsmedicine
ER -