TY - JOUR
T1 - Australia's foreign investment policy
T2 - An historical perspective
AU - Pokarier, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Why did Australia, historically open to overseas capital, turn to restrictive policy in the early 1970s, only to significantly liberalise again from the mid-1980s? Furthermore, why has the regulatory apparatus of Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB), established in the illiberal mid-1970s, been little changed over the last four decades, despite a return to relative openness? The paper finds that the initial illiberal turn arose from the changing sectoral and country-of-origin mix of foreign investment, a less liberal domestic and international ideational climate FDI, and from oppositional policy entrepreneurship. Liberalisation followed growing external imbalances, elite neo-liberal ideational change and transformative public leadership. The FIRB mechanism placated populist economic nationalist sentiment while allowing liberal policy in general, yet also tailored to the public and private interest logics of specific investment proposals. Remaining sectoral restrictions reflect both private interest influences and sector-specific public interest sensitivities.
AB - Why did Australia, historically open to overseas capital, turn to restrictive policy in the early 1970s, only to significantly liberalise again from the mid-1980s? Furthermore, why has the regulatory apparatus of Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB), established in the illiberal mid-1970s, been little changed over the last four decades, despite a return to relative openness? The paper finds that the initial illiberal turn arose from the changing sectoral and country-of-origin mix of foreign investment, a less liberal domestic and international ideational climate FDI, and from oppositional policy entrepreneurship. Liberalisation followed growing external imbalances, elite neo-liberal ideational change and transformative public leadership. The FIRB mechanism placated populist economic nationalist sentiment while allowing liberal policy in general, yet also tailored to the public and private interest logics of specific investment proposals. Remaining sectoral restrictions reflect both private interest influences and sector-specific public interest sensitivities.
KW - Australia
KW - Economic nationalism
KW - FDI
KW - Foreign direct investment
KW - History
KW - Policy
KW - Political economy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028589883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028589883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJPP.2017.086051
DO - 10.1504/IJPP.2017.086051
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028589883
SN - 1740-0600
VL - 13
SP - 212
EP - 231
JO - International Journal of Public Policy
JF - International Journal of Public Policy
IS - 3-5
ER -