TY - JOUR
T1 - Author Correction
T2 - Exploration of natural red-shifted rhodopsins using a machine learning-based Bayesian experimental design (Communications Biology, (2021), 4, 1, (362), 10.1038/s42003-021-01878-9)
AU - Inoue, Keiichi
AU - Karasuyama, Masayuki
AU - Nakamura, Ryoko
AU - Konno, Masae
AU - Yamada, Daichi
AU - Mannen, Kentaro
AU - Nagata, Takashi
AU - Inatsu, Yu
AU - Yawo, Hiromu
AU - Yura, Kei
AU - Béjà, Oded
AU - Kandori, Hideki
AU - Takeuchi, Ichiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The original version of the Article contained an error in the second paragraph of the “Discussion” section. It was stated that “32 out of 39 microbial rhodopsins were found to have red-shifted absorption compared with the base wavelengths of each subfamily of microbial rhodopsins…”. However, after the publication, the authors became aware that the λmax of BacHR from Rubricoccus marinus (Accession: WP 094550238.1) was previously reported to be 542 nm1, which is close to the value determined in this study (541 nm). The original version of the Article also contained an error in the fourth paragraph of the “Discussion” section. It was stated that “Four rhodopsins showed red-shifted absorption ≥20 nm than the base wavelength, three of which showed light-driven ion transport function.”. After publication, the authors become aware that ion transport activities of BacHRs from Rubricoccus marinus (Accession: WP 094550238.1) and Rubrivirga marina (Accession: WP 095509924.1) were also previously reported1.
AB - The original version of the Article contained an error in the second paragraph of the “Discussion” section. It was stated that “32 out of 39 microbial rhodopsins were found to have red-shifted absorption compared with the base wavelengths of each subfamily of microbial rhodopsins…”. However, after the publication, the authors became aware that the λmax of BacHR from Rubricoccus marinus (Accession: WP 094550238.1) was previously reported to be 542 nm1, which is close to the value determined in this study (541 nm). The original version of the Article also contained an error in the fourth paragraph of the “Discussion” section. It was stated that “Four rhodopsins showed red-shifted absorption ≥20 nm than the base wavelength, three of which showed light-driven ion transport function.”. After publication, the authors become aware that ion transport activities of BacHRs from Rubricoccus marinus (Accession: WP 094550238.1) and Rubrivirga marina (Accession: WP 095509924.1) were also previously reported1.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105158310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105158310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s42003-021-02090-5
DO - 10.1038/s42003-021-02090-5
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 33931743
AN - SCOPUS:85105158310
SN - 2399-3642
VL - 4
JO - Communications Biology
JF - Communications Biology
IS - 1
M1 - 532
ER -