TY - JOUR
T1 - Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension
AU - Nakao, Mutsuhiro
AU - Nomura, Shinobu
AU - Shimosawa, Tatsuo
AU - Fujita, Toshiro
AU - Kuboki, Tomifusa
PY - 2000/2
Y1 - 2000/2
N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension. Methods: Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF. Results: In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives. Conclusion: This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Blood pressure
KW - Essential hypertension
KW - Mental stress testing
KW - Self-monitoring
KW - White-coat hypertension
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034043788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034043788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X
DO - 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00104-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 10719133
AN - SCOPUS:0034043788
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 48
SP - 161
EP - 169
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
IS - 2
ER -