Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

Yon Do Chun; Jae Eung Oh; Yasushi Fujishima; Shinji Wakao; Ju Lee; Yun Hyun Cho

doi:10.1063/1.1853195

Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

Yon Do Chun^*, Jae Eung Oh, Yasushi Fujishima, Shinji Wakao, Ju Lee, Yun Hyun Cho

^*この研究の対応する著者

先進理工学部

研究成果: Article › 査読

4 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

本文言語	English
論文番号	10E105
ジャーナル	Journal of Applied Physics
巻	97
号	10
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1853195
出版ステータス	Published - 2005 5月 15

ASJC Scopus subject areas

物理学および天文学（全般）

文献へのアクセス

10.1063/1.1853195

他のファイルとリンク

フィンガープリント

「Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル

@article{fb740882c88244e0a4ba7538acba4472,

title = "Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation",

abstract = "In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.",

author = "Chun, {Yon Do} and Oh, {Jae Eung} and Yasushi Fujishima and Shinji Wakao and Ju Lee and Cho, {Yun Hyun}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was financially supported in part by Brain Korea 21 project and MOCIE through EIRC program in 2004.",

year = "2005",

month = may,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1063/1.1853195",

language = "English",

volume = "97",

journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",

issn = "0021-8979",

publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network method and 3D finite element method for magnetic-field computation

AU - Chun, Yon Do

AU - Oh, Jae Eung

AU - Fujishima, Yasushi

AU - Wakao, Shinji

AU - Lee, Ju

AU - Cho, Yun Hyun

N1 - Funding Information: This work was financially supported in part by Brain Korea 21 project and MOCIE through EIRC program in 2004.

PY - 2005/5/15

Y1 - 2005/5/15

N2 - In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

AB - In this article, in order to investigate the merits of three-dimensional (3D) equivalent magnetic circuit network (EMCN) method, a 3D standard benchmark model proposed by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan is analyzed. We also examine the accuracy of analysis results, the computer storage, and the computation time through the systematical comparison between 3D EMCN method and 3D finite element method based on hexahedral edge element. The incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient method was selected for the solver. From the results, we can confirm the usefulness of 3D EMCN method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20944432872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20944432872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.1853195

DO - 10.1063/1.1853195

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:20944432872

SN - 0021-8979

VL - 97

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

IS - 10

M1 - 10E105

ER -