My article (Inata, 2021) derives a unique subgame perfect equilibrium in a simple game to analyze power-sharing negotiation and commitment problems between an absolute monarch and the regime’s elites. This equilibrium is, however, not unique, strictly speaking; while it is effectively unique in a behavioral sense because it generates the unique outcomes, it does not rule out all best-reply strategies. The article’s conclusion about the role played by the public nevertheless remains intact. For interested readers, I will detail those equilibria in this correction.
ASJC Scopus subject areas