TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in activation patterns in elbow flexor muscles during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions
AU - Nakazawa, Kimitaka
AU - Kawakami, Yasuo
AU - Fukunaga, Tetsuo
AU - Yano, Hideo
AU - Miyashita, Mitsumasa
PY - 1993/3
Y1 - 1993/3
N2 - To investigate the relative activation of the synergistic muscles during three different types of muscle contraction, the electromyograms (EMG) of two elbow flexor muscles, the biceps brachii (BB) and the brachioradialis (BR), have been compared. To accomplish this eight healthy human subjects performed the following elbow flexions against the same load - concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions. The isometric contractions were performed at three elbow angles: 10, 45 and 90° (0° equal to full expension). The EMG were recorded by bipolar surface electrodes, and the relative activation between the two muscles was evaluated as the quotient of mean EMG activities (BR/BB). For the isotonic elbow flexions, BR/BB were calculated at three angle divisions: 0-30°, 30-60° and 60-90°. Results indicated that the relative activation of the BR during the concentric contractions was higher than that of the eccentric contraction, particularly at the extended elbow angles, i.e. the BR/BB of the concentric contractions for the elbow joint angles ranging from 0-30° and 30-60° were significantly greater (P<0.05) than those of the eccentric contractions. During the isometric and eccentric contractions, the BR/BB at the flexed joint angles tended to be greater than those at the extended angles. In contrast, there were no angle-dependent BR/BB variations during the concentric elbow flexions. Further, changing patterns in the EMG power spectra due to the type of contraction were different between BB and BR. These results indicated that the activation pattern in the two elbow flexor muscles varied with the muscle contraction pattern.
AB - To investigate the relative activation of the synergistic muscles during three different types of muscle contraction, the electromyograms (EMG) of two elbow flexor muscles, the biceps brachii (BB) and the brachioradialis (BR), have been compared. To accomplish this eight healthy human subjects performed the following elbow flexions against the same load - concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions. The isometric contractions were performed at three elbow angles: 10, 45 and 90° (0° equal to full expension). The EMG were recorded by bipolar surface electrodes, and the relative activation between the two muscles was evaluated as the quotient of mean EMG activities (BR/BB). For the isotonic elbow flexions, BR/BB were calculated at three angle divisions: 0-30°, 30-60° and 60-90°. Results indicated that the relative activation of the BR during the concentric contractions was higher than that of the eccentric contraction, particularly at the extended elbow angles, i.e. the BR/BB of the concentric contractions for the elbow joint angles ranging from 0-30° and 30-60° were significantly greater (P<0.05) than those of the eccentric contractions. During the isometric and eccentric contractions, the BR/BB at the flexed joint angles tended to be greater than those at the extended angles. In contrast, there were no angle-dependent BR/BB variations during the concentric elbow flexions. Further, changing patterns in the EMG power spectra due to the type of contraction were different between BB and BR. These results indicated that the activation pattern in the two elbow flexor muscles varied with the muscle contraction pattern.
KW - Elbow flexor muscles
KW - Electromyogram activity
KW - Motor control
KW - Muscle contraction pattern
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027532429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027532429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF00235096
DO - 10.1007/BF00235096
M3 - Article
C2 - 8477676
AN - SCOPUS:0027532429
SN - 0301-5548
VL - 66
SP - 214
EP - 220
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
IS - 3
ER -