TY - JOUR
T1 - Does reputation matter? Evidence from share repurchases
AU - Ota, Koji
AU - Kawase, Hironori
AU - Lau, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to comments and feedback of William Megginson (the editor), two anonymous referees, and David Emanuel. The authors have received research grants from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16K03762, JP19K01768, JP19K13866, JP18K12912).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - This paper examines whether the stock market considers the firm's reputation established through a history of management earnings forecasting when it evaluates open market repurchase announcements. We refer to this established reputation as the firm's “forecast reputation”. We find that while the stock market considers the firm's “repurchase reputation” (proxied by prior repurchase completion rates), it also considers the firm's forecast reputation established from the accuracy of prior management earnings forecasting, suggesting a spillover effect of forecast reputation. Further, interaction test between the two reputation variables reveals that the market reacts more to the firm's forecast reputation when its repurchase reputation is low. Additional analyses suggest that when a firm announces a share repurchase program for the first time (i.e., when there is no repurchase reputation), investors turn to the forecast reputation within the firm as an alternative source of reputation, on which the credibility of repurchase announcements is assessed. Overall, our study provides evidence that firms establish a reputation in the market through multiple sources of announcements.
AB - This paper examines whether the stock market considers the firm's reputation established through a history of management earnings forecasting when it evaluates open market repurchase announcements. We refer to this established reputation as the firm's “forecast reputation”. We find that while the stock market considers the firm's “repurchase reputation” (proxied by prior repurchase completion rates), it also considers the firm's forecast reputation established from the accuracy of prior management earnings forecasting, suggesting a spillover effect of forecast reputation. Further, interaction test between the two reputation variables reveals that the market reacts more to the firm's forecast reputation when its repurchase reputation is low. Additional analyses suggest that when a firm announces a share repurchase program for the first time (i.e., when there is no repurchase reputation), investors turn to the forecast reputation within the firm as an alternative source of reputation, on which the credibility of repurchase announcements is assessed. Overall, our study provides evidence that firms establish a reputation in the market through multiple sources of announcements.
KW - Reputation
KW - Share repurchases
KW - Spillover effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066071341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066071341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066071341
SN - 0929-1199
VL - 58
SP - 287
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Corporate Finance
JF - Journal of Corporate Finance
ER -