TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of pedestrian motivation and opening shape on pedestrian flow rate at an opening
AU - Imanishi, Mineko
AU - Jo, Akihide
AU - Sano, Tomonori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - In a general evacuation time calculation, a single value is used for the specific flow for any bottlenecks. However, the specific flow can actually depend on the situation or the spatial constraints of the bottleneck. In this study, an experiment with 189 participants under laboratory conditions was carried out to analyze the behavior of pedestrians at openings with/without sidewalls after the opening. Participants walked through an opening of 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, or 3.0 m in width, with sidewalls of 0, 1.0, or 2.0 m. Moreover, two different situations of pedestrian motivation for walking were set and compared. From the experiment, detailed walking trajectories were obtained. The results revealed that the specific flow at a bottleneck differed according to pedestrian motivation and spatial conditions. First, the presence of sidewalls reduced the specific flow by approximately 10%–15%. Concerning opening width, participants used a wider opening more efficiently. Participant motivation had the largest impact on the flow. People walked more quickly and queued more densely in front of the opening in the hurried situation. Then, when entering the opening, especially without sidewalls, they entered narrow gaps between other people and the wall more by twisting their shoulders when hurried.
AB - In a general evacuation time calculation, a single value is used for the specific flow for any bottlenecks. However, the specific flow can actually depend on the situation or the spatial constraints of the bottleneck. In this study, an experiment with 189 participants under laboratory conditions was carried out to analyze the behavior of pedestrians at openings with/without sidewalls after the opening. Participants walked through an opening of 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, or 3.0 m in width, with sidewalls of 0, 1.0, or 2.0 m. Moreover, two different situations of pedestrian motivation for walking were set and compared. From the experiment, detailed walking trajectories were obtained. The results revealed that the specific flow at a bottleneck differed according to pedestrian motivation and spatial conditions. First, the presence of sidewalls reduced the specific flow by approximately 10%–15%. Concerning opening width, participants used a wider opening more efficiently. Participant motivation had the largest impact on the flow. People walked more quickly and queued more densely in front of the opening in the hurried situation. Then, when entering the opening, especially without sidewalls, they entered narrow gaps between other people and the wall more by twisting their shoulders when hurried.
KW - Bottleneck
KW - Experiment
KW - Flow rate
KW - Human behavior
KW - Sidewall
KW - Specific flow
KW - Walking trajectory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085214331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085214331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103056
DO - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103056
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085214331
SN - 0379-7112
VL - 120
JO - Fire Safety Journal
JF - Fire Safety Journal
M1 - 103056
ER -