TY - JOUR
T1 - How to profit from de facto standard-based competition
T2 - Learning from Japanese firms' experiences
AU - Yamada, Hideo
AU - Kurokawa, Sam
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - This paper discusses strategic issues related to technological de facto standards. Based on our historical and empirical analyses of 13 cases mainly observed in the Japanese audio-visual and IT-related fields, we pose the following six propositions on de facto standard-based competition: 1 User will benefit by utilising and exchanging skill/software based on de facto standards, and manufacturers will benefit by forming de facto standards through their market dominance and licensing income. 2 A product which requires a high level of connectivity and accumulated skill/software is likely to form a de facto technological standard. 3 The earlier a firm establishes a majority of the market share, the more likely it is to establish a technological de facto standard. 4 A de facto standard is likely to be fixed when its diffusion (share) reaches 2-3% of the market. 5 The more killer applications a firm can introduce the more likely it is to establish/maintain/profit from a technological de facto standard. 6 The more efforts a firm makes to promote its technology/product to its competitors, suppliers and distributors, the more likely it is to establish/maintain/profit from a technological de facto standard.
AB - This paper discusses strategic issues related to technological de facto standards. Based on our historical and empirical analyses of 13 cases mainly observed in the Japanese audio-visual and IT-related fields, we pose the following six propositions on de facto standard-based competition: 1 User will benefit by utilising and exchanging skill/software based on de facto standards, and manufacturers will benefit by forming de facto standards through their market dominance and licensing income. 2 A product which requires a high level of connectivity and accumulated skill/software is likely to form a de facto technological standard. 3 The earlier a firm establishes a majority of the market share, the more likely it is to establish a technological de facto standard. 4 A de facto standard is likely to be fixed when its diffusion (share) reaches 2-3% of the market. 5 The more killer applications a firm can introduce the more likely it is to establish/maintain/profit from a technological de facto standard. 6 The more efforts a firm makes to promote its technology/product to its competitors, suppliers and distributors, the more likely it is to establish/maintain/profit from a technological de facto standard.
KW - Competitive strategy
KW - De facto standard
KW - Japanese management
KW - Management of technology
KW - Technology strategy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19344363074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19344363074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJTM.2005.006710
DO - 10.1504/IJTM.2005.006710
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:19344363074
SN - 0267-5730
VL - 30
SP - 299
EP - 326
JO - International Journal of Technology Management
JF - International Journal of Technology Management
IS - 3-4
ER -