TY - JOUR
T1 - Ionization loss of relativistic electrons and its fluctuations in gas proportional counters
AU - Nagata, K.
AU - Kuge, A.
AU - Nakamoto, A.
AU - Hasebe, Nobuyuki
AU - Kikuchi, J.
AU - Doke, T.
PY - 1976
Y1 - 1976
N2 - Measurements of the ionization loss have been achieved with high accuracy using two proportional counters with sensitive lengths of 9 and 30 cm, filled with Ar+10% CH4 mixture at various pressures (0.13 approximately 2.0 atm). The widths of the ionization loss distributions disagree with those predicted by the Landau (1944) and Blunck-Leisegang (1950) theories, but rather, are in fairly good agreement with those calculated by Ispiryan et al. (1974) using the Monte Carlo method. In traversing thin layers of the counter gas, the most probable energy losses are smaller than those predicted by the Landau formula with the inclusion of the Sternheimer correction for the density effect, but the discrepancy decreases as the thickness of the gas layer increases. Furthermore, both sets of data obtained from the two counters lie almost on the curve of the most probable energy loss plotted against the thickness of the counter gas. The Garibyan and Ispiryan interpretation (1972) seems to provide the best explanation as it takes into account the transition radiation effect.
AB - Measurements of the ionization loss have been achieved with high accuracy using two proportional counters with sensitive lengths of 9 and 30 cm, filled with Ar+10% CH4 mixture at various pressures (0.13 approximately 2.0 atm). The widths of the ionization loss distributions disagree with those predicted by the Landau (1944) and Blunck-Leisegang (1950) theories, but rather, are in fairly good agreement with those calculated by Ispiryan et al. (1974) using the Monte Carlo method. In traversing thin layers of the counter gas, the most probable energy losses are smaller than those predicted by the Landau formula with the inclusion of the Sternheimer correction for the density effect, but the discrepancy decreases as the thickness of the gas layer increases. Furthermore, both sets of data obtained from the two counters lie almost on the curve of the most probable energy loss plotted against the thickness of the counter gas. The Garibyan and Ispiryan interpretation (1972) seems to provide the best explanation as it takes into account the transition radiation effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248330262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248330262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0022-3727/9/13/011
DO - 10.1088/0022-3727/9/13/011
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34248330262
SN - 0022-3727
VL - 9
SP - 1907
EP - 1917
JO - Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
JF - Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
IS - 13
M1 - 011
ER -