TY - GEN
T1 - Persuasive power in groups
T2 - 6th International Conference on Persuasive Technology: "Persuasive Technology and Design: Enhancing Sustainability and Health", PERSUASIVE 2011
AU - Midden, Cees
AU - Ham, Jaap
AU - Kleppe, Mieke
AU - Kimura, Hiroaki
AU - Nakajima, Tatsuo
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - In this paper we argue that energy conservation is largely a group phenomenon requiring group interventions to achieve change. Persuasive technology can help to provide these interventions. The present study explores the influence of group feedback and individual comparative feedback on energy consumption using an experimental simulation paradigm. To account for cultural differences in group orientation and the power of group feedback, two studies were conducted, one in the Netherlands and one in Japan, in which groups of participants received feedback on everyday tasks. As expected, Dutch participants saved more energy when individual comparison feedback was present, but not the Japanese participants. In contrast, as expected, group feedback caused Japanese participants to save more energy. Providing solely group feedback did not promote energy saving in the Netherlands. Group feedback made the Dutch save more energy only in combination with individual comparison feedback. These results suggest that persuasive technology can employ the power of feedback as a group intervention, but that relevant cultural orientations are crucial.
AB - In this paper we argue that energy conservation is largely a group phenomenon requiring group interventions to achieve change. Persuasive technology can help to provide these interventions. The present study explores the influence of group feedback and individual comparative feedback on energy consumption using an experimental simulation paradigm. To account for cultural differences in group orientation and the power of group feedback, two studies were conducted, one in the Netherlands and one in Japan, in which groups of participants received feedback on everyday tasks. As expected, Dutch participants saved more energy when individual comparison feedback was present, but not the Japanese participants. In contrast, as expected, group feedback caused Japanese participants to save more energy. Providing solely group feedback did not promote energy saving in the Netherlands. Group feedback made the Dutch save more energy only in combination with individual comparison feedback. These results suggest that persuasive technology can employ the power of feedback as a group intervention, but that relevant cultural orientations are crucial.
KW - Comparative feedback
KW - Group feedback
KW - Persuasive technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877765194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877765194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2467803.2467804
DO - 10.1145/2467803.2467804
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84877765194
SN - 9781450306690
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
BT - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Persuasive Technology
Y2 - 2 June 2011 through 5 June 2011
ER -