TY - JOUR
T1 - Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia
T2 - An environmental assessment perspective
AU - Ogihara, Akira
AU - Shimaoka, Mikiko
AU - Roppongi, Hitomi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.
AB - This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.
KW - Accessto information
KW - Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
KW - Multi-stakeholder process (MSP)
KW - Public participation
KW - Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958533311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958533311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.029
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84958533311
SN - 0264-8377
VL - 52
SP - 535
EP - 542
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
ER -