TY - JOUR
T1 - Prosody helps L1 speakers but confuses L2 learners
T2 - 8th Speech Prosody 2016
AU - Nakamura, Chie
AU - Arai, Manabu
AU - Hirose, Yuki
AU - Flynn, Suzanne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, International Speech Communications Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.
AB - Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.
KW - Contrastive prosody
KW - Eye-tracking
KW - Garden-path
KW - Referential ambiguity resolution
KW - Second language acquisition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982908233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982908233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21437/speechprosody.2016-118
DO - 10.21437/speechprosody.2016-118
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84982908233
SN - 2333-2042
VL - 2016-January
SP - 577
EP - 581
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody
JF - Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody
Y2 - 31 May 2016 through 3 June 2016
ER -